Bayram Cigerli Blog

Bigger İnfo Center and Archive
  • Herşey Dahil Sadece 350 Tl'ye Web Site Sahibi Ol

    Hızlı ve kolay bir şekilde sende web site sahibi olmak istiyorsan tek yapman gereken sitenin aşağısında bulunan iletişim formu üzerinden gerekli bilgileri girmen. Hepsi bu kadar.

  • Web Siteye Reklam Ver

    Sende web sitemize reklam vermek veya ilan vermek istiyorsan. Tek yapman gereken sitenin en altında bulunan yere iletişim bilgilerini girmen yeterli olacaktır. Ekip arkadaşlarımız siziznle iletişime gececektir.

  • Web Sitemizin Yazarı Editörü OL

    Sende kalemine güveniyorsan web sitemizde bir şeyler paylaşmak yazmak istiyorsan siteinin en aşağısında bulunan iletişim formunu kullanarak bizimle iletişime gecebilirisni

Mitchell Station -- Part 2

In the last post, Guest Blogger SteamCarriage mentioned an odd artifact found in the fields of Jim Mitchell's Woodside Farm southwest of Hockessin, with the date of 1892 on it. He gave us an excellent background on the creation and evolution of Delaware's (and Mill Creek Hundred's) unique, curved northern border. In this post, SteamCarriage will delve deeper into the events of 1892, and explain exactly how this MCH hill was used. Now, the exciting conclusion of  Mitchell Station...


--Researched and written by SteamCarriage

Stone found in the fields of Woodside
United States Coast and Geodetic Survey
It took nearly 40 more years before another Commission sought out the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey (an early version of the US Geological Survey) to resolve the matter.  The Survey appointed William Chandler Hodgkins to lead the project.  The United States Coast and Geodetic Survey published a very detailed report titled “A Historical Account of the Boundary Line between the States of Pennsylvania and Delaware” by W.C. Hodgkins, dated December 1, 1893.   The 52-page report is available online through Google Books and well worth the read for anyone wanting to know the particulars of the survey.  It is part of the Report of the Superintendent of the US Coast and Geodetic Survey for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1893 (in two parts).

After initial field work, Hodgkins discovered two circles would best define the northern border between Delaware and Pennsylvania and he proposed a solution to the Commission.  They accepted Hodgkins’ analysis and he completed the official boundary survey in 1892-1893 defining the eastern arc boundary of Delaware and Pennsylvania along with the intersection of the Delaware-Maryland border.  The Wedge became part of Delaware and the Delaware-Pennsylvania arc border is a complex arc defined by two different radius arcs with neither center point at the New Castle Court House (but very close).

William Hodgkins had access to the latest equipment and techniques from which to perform his analysis.  His first step was to locate existing markers and survey points and determine their accuracy, etc.  His primary instrument was a repeating theodolite with an 8-inch horizontal scale reading to five seconds of arc.  In conjunction with the theodolite was a heliotrope that used the sun’s rays reflecting off mirrors to form a focused beam of light that could be seen over great distances.  They also used carbide fueled acetylene beacons at night when the air was calm for surveying longer distances.  In order to use the theodolite and heliotrope it was often necessary to stand poles vertically and even build tall scaffolds in order to raise the instruments above tree tops for unobstructed viewing of targets.



Photos of Acetylene Beacon and Theodolite of the era,
 courtesy NOAA (National Geodetic Survey)

With his commissioning on March 8, 1892 W.C. Hodgkins determined the six steps he would take;
Determine the following points which would become the bases for determining the final border;
   o   An official point at the New Castle Courthouse
   o   The Mason-Dixon point for the northeast corner of Maryland
   o   The 12-arc point on the Delaware River
   o   As many points as determined in 1701 still existing
Mapping of these points and determination of various applicable state boundary arcs
Determination by United States Coast and Geodetic Survey commissioners the official arc(s) to be used
Actually survey and placement of preliminary markers for the state boundary line
Review of the surveyed state boundary line by the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey Commissioners to resolve any discrepancies
The permanent marking of the line every half mile with approved stone obelisks



William Hodgkins’ team immediately began scouting out existing boundary markers and then set to work determining their geographical coordinates.  To determine a point’s coordinate, triangulation would be used and the team sought out several key locations from which to determine the actual boundary.  These are shown on the drawing from the survey report and include; I – the Mason-Dixon determined northwestern corner of Maryland; K – a well-defined existing marker on the boundaries of Kennett and Pennsbury townships in Chester County, PA; C – a hickory tree marking the boundaries of Concord and Bethel townships in Delaware County, PA; R – the “ruins”, a location on the Delaware River of a former house or windmill that had been the starting point for previous border surveys.

With his data in hand Hodgkins proposed that the northern arc border between Delaware and Pennsylvania be an arc defined by segments of two arcs.  Based on his analysis he found the eastern part of the DE-PA border (basically the boundary common to Delaware County, PA and New Castle County, DE) from a point known as Kennett-Pennsbury east to “the ruins” on the Delaware River to be reasonably accurate.  An arc of radius 12.82 miles drawn from a point actually located in the Delaware River southeast of the New Castle Courthouse would provide an accurate definition of the border from Kennett-Pennsbury to the Delaware River.

For the western part of the boundary (basically the boundary common to Chester County, PA and New Castle County, DE), an arc of radius 11.58 miles centered on a point northwest of the courthouse would define the boundary between Kennett-Pennsbury and the Mason-Dixon Line going west.  Hodgkins’ report of 1893 details the geometry he proposed to finally define the Maryland-Delaware-Pennsylvania boundaries.


1892 Survey Points

With approval from the Commission Hodgkins returned to place the actual Delaware-Pennsylvania boundary markers at ½ mile intervals.  In order to do this it was necessary to erect stations on either side of the boundary by designating major triangulation points.  These included Hamorton, Londonderry, White, and Whiteman in PA, Centerville, Meetinghouse Hill, and Mitchell’s Farm in DE, and Grays Hill in MD.  From these primary points, secondary triangulation points were determined from which the actual boundary points could be placed.

From known stations at locations such as Centerville and Meeting House Hill, DE, Londonderry, PA, and Gray’s Hill, MD other stations were defined including Mitchell Station on Woodside Farm, DE.  Mitchell Station would be defined from Meeting House Hill and Walnut Stations.  Mitchell Station would then be used to determine Hoopes, Foulk, and Southwood stations in PA as well as O’Neill and Stephen stations in DE.  Each of these stations would then be used to determine the precise locations of each of the 1/2–mile markers between mileposts 2 and 6.

Mitchell Station, located on the Mitchell’s Woodside Farm was one of the major points used in determining at least seven other triangulation points.  Located on a high knoll on the farm, a wooden tower was erected similar to the one pictured below.  This would have been a substantial station having been used for both Heliotrope, carbide beacon, and Theodolite operations.  Mr. Mitchell has noted that stories have been passed down through the generations that a tall wooden tower was erected by the survey team and that many nights the surveyors were there all night tending the very bright beacon.  As night air is typically more still and uniform in temperature, the beacon was seen as stationary at great distances instead of scintillating due to air density caused refraction effects.


Examining the 1892 Survey’s Data
In reading William Hodgkins “A Historical Account of the Boundary Line between the States of Pennsylvania and Delaware” we got to wondering just how accurate the data might have been as compared to modern online maps that are available.  With survey triangulation point coordinates, as well as the coordinates for each of the final boundary stations was entered into an Excel spreadsheet that could be imported into Google Visualizer we started drawing some maps.



One of the first maps to draw simply plotted the survey points in Google Maps, on a terrain map.  One of the features of GPS Visualizer is that it can draw tracks for selected groups of points so we let it do this for several of the point groupings.  On the map you’ll see the three 12-mile arcs leading to the boundary disputes.  The series of triangles and squares mark the present day border of Delaware-Pennsylvania and you’ll note the markers fall on the either the light or dark tan arcs depending if your east (triangles) or west (squares) of the Kennett-Pennsbury marker noted on the map.  The red arc, for reference, is the 12-mile point from the steeple on the New Castle County Courthouse and represents what the boundary “should” have been had today’s surveying equipment and techniques been available back in 1701.  Around the New Castle Court House’s red star are the arc center point locations, marked by light/dark tan stars, for the other two arcs as found by Hodgkins’ team.

If we plot the points and arcs on a terrain map with state borders and some color shading for elevations, the Wedge clearly stands out at the middle left.  With the red arc marking 12-miles from the courthouse steeple, it shows how the dispute for where the Delaware-Maryland, and Delaware-Pennsylvania boundaries were before the survey.  Choose the arc point at the Maryland east-west boundary with Pennsylvania and the northeast corner of Maryland is at Whiteman.  Use the tangent point of the arc and a north-south boundary line for Maryland-Delaware and the northeast corner of Maryland is its modern day location.



Also note that the Delaware-Maryland border from the northeast corner of Maryland to the Tangent Point is exactly north-south, however that south of the Tangent Point the Delaware-Maryland border, while a straight line, is not true north-south but at an angle.  Many maps show this Delaware-Maryland boundary line as straight along the entire western side of Delaware and it is not.

It is also interesting to note how the modern map eastern border for Delaware, along the New Jersey shore of the Delaware River, followed the Delaware eastern arc line to jump back to the center of the Delaware River as we cross from Delaware into Pennsylvania.

One of the features of Google Earth is to be able to zoom around the countryside and take a low-level bird’s eye view.  If we fly from the Atlantic Ocean coming northwesterly over New Jersey we can get an idea of relative heights of the major stations.  For example, from New Castle Courthouse they had to be able to see Gray’s Hill, Meeting House Hill and Centerville.  Seeing those allowed them to coordinate with Londonderry and White.  They could then set out major points such as Walnut, Mitchell and Stephen, etc. You’ll see those major points in the map below standing above those of the actual boundary stones forming the border arc.


There has been much written over the years about how the various borders of Delaware, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey were established.  Unfortunately some accountings contain errors.  Having access to the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey’s report “A Historical Account of the Boundary Line between the States of Pennsylvania and Delaware” by W.C. Hodgkins, the details of the final determination of the 12-mile arc boundary are been well documented.

Peter Le

Peter Le
for Andrew Christian

http://www.andrewchristian.com/index.php/peter-le.html








Bandırma'nın 93. Kurtuluş Yılı KUTLU OLSUN !





Tarihte bu gün 17 Eylül 1922’ de, Hasan Tahsin’in ilk kurşunuyla başlayan Kurtuluş Savaşımız'ın, Bandırma Ayyıldıztepe'de yaşanan çarpışmalarda, düşmana sıkılan ' son kurşun 'un atıldığı bu tepede savaşın zaferle sonuçlandığı gündür.

02 temmuz 1920 tarihinde Yunanlılar tarafından işgal edilen Bandırma 2 yıl, 2 ay, 15 gün işgal altında kalır. Bandırma’da çok uzun yıllar Türklerle bir arada

Knitting Season


Like most things in life, my knitting projects ebb and flow through out the year. In September, when one is longing for a break in hot weather, when there are subtle signs autumn might be on it's way; the knitting craze comes back full force and I find myself with a long list of projects I am anxious to start! September also coincides with our local yarn shop's annual sale and the Wisconsin Sheep and Wool Festival. How can I not be ready to furiously start knitting after all that woolly loveliness?!
(Socks on the right side and a navy cardigan in progress on the left!)

I have to admit, I have been keeping busy through the summer knitting several pairs of socks for myself. Sock weather will be back before we know it! The darker pink pair is made from Sun Valley Fiber's Fingering yarn in a simple rib pattern. The blue pair are my Wear to Work Socks. And the pink striped pair on the needles is a basic sock in Sweet Georgia sock yarn.

I am also extremely excited to announce I have a new pattern on Ravelry! Wear to Work Socks. A basic sock, with a bit of embellishment on the foot, perfect for flats or just wearing around the house!
I thought it a shame all the fanciness on most socks are on the leg where it gets covered by pants or boots. These solve that problem! Now, even if you are just wearing them around the house, there is something interesting to gaze at! With a simple 4 row repeat and plenty of plain knitting between, the pattern is easily memorized. (Which is my favorite kind! Who wants to keep referring to a pattern while watching a movie or zooming down the freeway?)

All the info is on the Ravelry page where you can also purchase the pattern. I can't wait to wear them!

Do you knit? If so what is on your needles now?

A Good Bedside Book


 
For some strange reason, I enjoy those guides to the world of Sherlock Holmes that may not necessarily say anything new, but say it well. These books are helpful for neophytes, and fun for veteran Sherlockians.
Such is The Bedside, Bathtub & Armchair Companion to Sherlock Holmes by Dick Riley and Pam McAllister.
Although the book was published in 1999, I only recently picked up a copy. Knowing that the authors edited a similarly titled Agatha Christie book 20 years earlier, I frankly came to the volume with low expectations. Bedside far exceeded them.
Just about every familiar topic is given a brief chapter – Arthur Conan Doyle, Holmes’s London (with crime map), actors who have played Sherlock Holmes, cocaine, Moriarty, Watson, parodies and pastiches, canines in the Canon, etc.
But I particularly liked the essays on the British Empire, the orders of nobility (always a puzzler to most of us Yanks), and the value of money in the Canonical period – from pence to pounds.
Each of the 60 adventures gets a capsule treatment, which makes up a good portion of the book. The summary is called “Principle Predicament,” but the capsule consists of more than that. It also includes a notable feature, sometimes a quotable quote, and occasionally a disquisition on “oddities and discrepancies.”
My favorite quotable quote is one that had not previously caught my attention. In “The Adventure of Golden Pince-Nez,” Holmes asks, “What did you do, Hopkins, after you had made certain that you had made certain of nothing?”
I also like the authors’ approach to “The Adventure of the Empty House.” They just don’t bother with the oddities and discrepancies: “Though astute readers can poke numerous holes in this adventure, no one really cares about the inconsistencies for, after all, Holmes has returned.”
Amen to that!  

Mitchell Station -- Part 1

Time for another guest post, this one from a new contributor, SteamCarriage. It's about a subject I've always meant to get around to, but never have -- Delaware's unique northern boundary. What's neat about these posts are how they tie the topic in to MCH with a specific object and site, located on a historic property previously covered here. Thank you, SteamCarriage for all your work, and enjoy!


-- Researched and written by SteamCarriage


Stone, urn, and spike found in the fields of Woodside
While working a field on one of the higher locations of Woodside Farm, owner Jim Mitchell uncovered a flat square stone that had long been buried. On it was chiseled a triangle with a hole in the center along with the markings “U S 1892”. Under the stone Jim found a clay urn with a square iron spike secured in the center that aligned with the hole in the cover stone. Jim shared the find with the author and asked if we could determine the stone’s origins, use, etc. After some research it was learned that Mitchell Station was a point selected by the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey in 1892 for the purpose of settling, once and for all, the disputed 12-mile arc boundary that existed between Pennsylvania and Delaware. What follows is a brief history of how the dispute came to existence and how the stone came to Woodside Farm as a key element in the process the US government used to resurvey and establish the 12-mile arc boundary putting the matter to rest in 1892-3.

Delaware, Pennsylvania, and Maryland
The first settlers arrived to the lower shores of Delaware in 1631. In 1632 King Charles I granted Cæcilius Calvert, the second Baron of Baltimore, a large estate between the 38th and 40th parallels of north latitude. The land included the present states of Delaware, Maryland, and the lower portion of Pennsylvania. In 1664 King Charles II granted his brother, James Calvert, the Duke of York, all the lands between the Connecticut and De la Ware (Delaware River as it is known today) Rivers which encompassed parts of the present states of eastern Pennsylvania, eastern New York, and most of New England and included the colony at Newcastle (New Castle, Delaware as we know it today).

In 1681 King Charles II granted William Penn all the land north of the 40th parallel up to the 43rd parallel and west of the De la Ware River forcing both the Duke of York and Lord Baltimore to give up some lands previously given them by English monarchs. Penn was required to work out the boundaries. In order to have better access to the ocean, Penn convinced the Duke of York to lease him the land within the 12-mile arc centered on Newcastle along with territory south to Cape Henlopean. In trying to determine where the new boundaries would be located, William Penn, the Duke of York, and Lord Baltimore turned to King James II for resolution.

One issue that turned up involved the Duke of York wanting to insure that Penn wasn’t given rights to York’s settlement at Newcastle. While a 20-mile distance was requested, all parties agreed on a 12-mile arc centered on the Court House in Newcastle. In 1701 Isaac Taylor and Thomas Pierson laid down the first arc marking the boundary between Pennsylvania and Newcastle colony. This agreement marked the birth of the unique arc that forms the present day boundary between Delaware and Pennsylvania.

Lord Baltimore lost his claim on much of the rest of the Delmarva Peninsula lands which were claimed by the Duke of York, when King James II decreed in late 1688 that the lower three peninsula territories (New Castle County was actually the northernmost of three counties referred to at the time as “the lower three counties of Pennsylvania or the lower peninsula territories”) would now become part of the lands owned by Penn. King James II established a loose north-south boundary down the Delmarva Peninsula with Maryland Colony west of the boundary and the “lower three colonies of Pennsylvania” east of the boundary. The boundaries soon fell into dispute between the Penn and Calvert families.

In the early 1730s after a multi-year feud had broken out between the Penn family of Pennsylvania Colony and the Calvert family of Maryland Colony over the location of the east-west border between their two colonies, King George II negotiated a truce. He commissioned surveyor Jeremiah Dixon and astronomer Charles Mason to finally decide, based on colonial records, the boundary line between Pennsylvania and Maryland colonies.

Starting in the mid-1760s it took the Mason and Dixon four plus years (1763-1767) to figure out the 83-mile north-south boundary between Maryland and present day Delaware which at the time was under Penn family rule. The two men would also determine the 233-mile east-west boundary between present day Pennsylvania and Maryland. The boundaries would be marked with limestone blocks, many of which still survive in place today. A few weeks before the signing of the Declaration of Independence the three lower counties of Pennsylvania established themselves as the Delaware Territory, independent of Pennsylvania, Maryland, or Britain. With the signing of the Declaration of Independence the Penn and Calvert families' past feuds no longer mattered.

The Mason-Dixon Line

Surveying the Mason-Dixon Line
In order to perform their work Mason and Dixon needed to find the point where north-south and east-west boundaries intersected (northeast corner of Maryland).  To do this they had to resurvey the western part of the 12-mile northern arc boundary between Pennsylvania’s Chester County and Delaware’s New Castle County.  They didn’t resurvey the complete arc starting at the Delaware River which had they done so would have eliminated future controversy.

The arc boundary, initially determined when King Charles II granted William Penn all land north of a 12-mile radius centered at New Castle, was first surveyed in 1701 by Thomas Pierson of New Castle County and Isaac Taylor of West Chester County.  The arc was to extend from the Delaware River westward for 120 degrees were it would terminate.  The 12-mile arc boundary is sometimes referred to as part of the Mason-Dixon Line, however this is inaccurate and Mason and Dixon did not determine the arc’s total position; only used its western-most point in determining the east-west Pennsylvania-Maryland border.  Likewise the southern east-west boundary of Delaware is often referred to as part of the Mason-Dixon Line and as Mason-Dixon never surveyed this border, only set the southwest intersection point, Delaware’s southern border is not considered part of the Mason-Dixon Line.

1847 map showing The Wedge

The actual details of the various land transactions that occurred from the arrival of the first settlers until the 1890s is well beyond the scope of this article. Suffice it to say that between the surveying tools available in 1701 and later, the use of notches in trees, marker stones placed in fields, not to mention how boundaries were described in land deeds, any boundary was suspect. As vast territories were subdivided, challenges to boundaries forced the redefinition of who owned what. No doubt old markers were moved to “make things come out right” or to simply take land from others.

Improvements in surveying equipment and techniques brought about more accurate results adding another layer of complexity. Mix in the Mason-Dixon surveys in the 1760s, an additional boundary determination done by Lt. Colonel J.D. Graham in the 1850s, some boundaries being determined from locations with origins as points in the city of Philadelphia, and the only boundaries that weren’t being disputed were the original Mason-Dixon determined boundary between Pennsylvania and Maryland (39 degrees 43 minutes north parallel) and the boundary between Delaware and Maryland from the 12-mile arc southward.

The “Wedge” and the “Horn”
Depending on how one interpreted various land grants and deeds, the work of Mason & Dixon, and the remaining boundary markers, two pieces of land remained in dispute; the boundary between Chester County Pennsylvania and New Castle County, Delaware. In 1849 a commission was established to resolve the matter once and for all. Unfortunately this effort added more confusion and only made the situation worse. Depending on who’s surveying results you used to define Delaware’s arc and western boundaries, three possible circles defined Delaware’s northern border. The three 12-mile arc boundaries that were questioned as to which was official are shown on the map. Some of the issues determining these three 12-mile arcs were if the steeple or the front steps of the New Castle Courthouse were set at the origin. Is high-tide or low-tide or mean-tide of the Delaware River chosen as the starting point for the 120-degree arc.

The Three Different Possible Borders

What resulted was a long sliver of land that was claimed by both Pennsylvania and Delaware with Pennsylvania claiming the stronger ownership. Pennsylvania even went as far as to show a lower portion of the disputed territory, known as “The Wedge” or “The Flatiron”, on state maps (shown in red on the map below). The territory that made up “The Horn” as it became known (green on the map below) resulted in response to which circle should be used to defined the Pennsylvania-Delaware border.

The Wedge (in red) and the Horn (in green)

The dispute involved the exact location of the border point shared by all three states. At its most westerly location all the land in the Horn and Wedge belonged to Delaware and Delaware’s border transitioned from a straight north-south line to the arc in a smooth manner. At its most easterly location, the Horn’s lands would be claimed by Pennsylvania while the Wedge’s lands could be claimed by either Pennsylvania or Delaware. In this scenario the ¾ mile offset in distance between the two locations creates an east-west step transition from the north-south border of Maryland and Delaware to the start of the arc.

An excellent account of the evolution of Delaware's northern boundary, and a pretty clear explanation as to why the 1892 resurvey was needed. In the next post, SteamCarriage will carry us through that survey and explain the stone found in Mr. Mitchell's field.

12.sınıf coğrafya günlük ders planları

12.sınıf günlük planlar
https://yadi.sk/d/N6JbH4ajj7PPF

11.sınıf coğrafya günlük ders planları

11.sınıf günlük planlar
https://yadi.sk/d/9a4HHIspj7PB9

10.sınıf coğrafya günlük ders planları

10.sınıf günlük planları
https://yadi.sk/d/GFAgkcVwj7Nxu

9.sınıf coğrafya günlük ders planları

9.sınıf günlük planları
https://yadi.sk/d/s_DcX6ZFj7Naw