Page 20 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
brethren. 13:9 Is not the whole land before thee? separate thyself, I pray thee, from me:
-
Herşey Dahil Sadece 350 Tl'ye Web Site Sahibi Ol
Hızlı ve kolay bir şekilde sende web site sahibi olmak istiyorsan tek yapman gereken sitenin aşağısında bulunan iletişim formu üzerinden gerekli bilgileri girmen. Hepsi bu kadar.
-
Web Siteye Reklam Ver
Sende web sitemize reklam vermek veya ilan vermek istiyorsan. Tek yapman gereken sitenin en altında bulunan yere iletişim bilgilerini girmen yeterli olacaktır. Ekip arkadaşlarımız siziznle iletişime gececektir.
-
Web Sitemizin Yazarı Editörü OL
Sende kalemine güveniyorsan web sitemizde bir şeyler paylaşmak yazmak istiyorsan siteinin en aşağısında bulunan iletişim formunu kullanarak bizimle iletişime gecebilirisni
Page 19 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
Page 19 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
12:13 Say, I pray thee, thou art my sister: that it may be well with me for
Page 18 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
Page 18 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
forth with them from Ur of the Chaldees, to go into the land of Canaan; and they came unto Haran, and
Page 17 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
Page 17 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
11:12 And Arphaxad lived five and thirty years, and begat Salah: 11:13
Page 16 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
Page 16 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
Abimael, and Sheba, 10:29 And Ophir, and Havilah, and Jobab: all these were
Page 15 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
Page 15 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
10:7 And the sons of Cush; Seba, and Havilah, and Sabtah, and Raamah, and Sabtechah: and the sons of Raamah;
Page 14 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
Page 14 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
9:18 And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of
Page 13 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
Page 13 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
9:2 And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of
Page 12 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
Page 12 The First Book of Moses: The Old Testament of the King James Version of the Bible
the face of the whole earth: then he put forth his hand, and took her, and
Singh on Indian princely states and the Law of Nations
Prabhakar Singh (Jindal Global Law School) published the following article earlier this fall: "Indian Princely States and the 19th-century Transformation of the Law of Nations," Journal of International Dispute Settlement 11:3 (Sept. 2020), 365-87. Here's the abstract:
The role of the roughly 600 Indian princely kingdoms in the transformation of the law of nations into international law during the 19th century is an overlooked episode of international legal history. The Indian princely states effected a gradual end of the Mughal and the Maratha confederacies while appropriating international legal language. The Privy Council—before and after 1858—sanctified within common law as the acts of state, both, the seizure of territories from Indian kings and the ossification of encumbrances attached to the annexed territories. After the Crown takeover of the East India Company in 1858, the British India Government carefully rebooted, even mimicked, the native polyandric relationship of the tribal chiefs, petty states and semi-sovereigns with the Mughal–Maratha complex using multi-normative legal texts. Put down in the British stationery as engagements, sunnuds and treaties, these colonial texts projected an imperially layered nature of the native sovereignty. I challenge the metropole's claims of a one-way export to the colonies of the assumed normative surpluses. I argue that the periphery while responding to a ‘jurisdictional imperialism' upended international law's civilisation-giving thesis by exporting law to the metropole.
Further information is available here.
--Mitra Sharafi
Kayıtlar
