Bayram Cigerli Blog

Bigger İnfo Center and Archive
  • Herşey Dahil Sadece 350 Tl'ye Web Site Sahibi Ol

    Hızlı ve kolay bir şekilde sende web site sahibi olmak istiyorsan tek yapman gereken sitenin aşağısında bulunan iletişim formu üzerinden gerekli bilgileri girmen. Hepsi bu kadar.

  • Web Siteye Reklam Ver

    Sende web sitemize reklam vermek veya ilan vermek istiyorsan. Tek yapman gereken sitenin en altında bulunan yere iletişim bilgilerini girmen yeterli olacaktır. Ekip arkadaşlarımız siziznle iletişime gececektir.

  • Web Sitemizin Yazarı Editörü OL

    Sende kalemine güveniyorsan web sitemizde bir şeyler paylaşmak yazmak istiyorsan siteinin en aşağısında bulunan iletişim formunu kullanarak bizimle iletişime gecebilirisni

CD - DVD etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
CD - DVD etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

Anne-Sophie Mutter on John Williams














By James Longstaffe

Presto Classical, Interview — August 29, 2019

Celebrated German violinist Anne-Sophie Mutter has long been both a dedicated commissioner of new works for the violin as well as an ardent fan of the music of composer John Williams; her new album combines these two facets by presenting a selection of Williams's movie themes from across the decades, specially reworked for violin and orchestra, and conducted by the composer himself.

Alongside well-loved melodies from films such as Star Wars, Harry Potter, Memoirs of a Geisha, and Schindler's List, the album presents a selection of music from rarer gems such as Dracula, Sabrina, Cinderella Liberty, and Far and Away. I spoke to Anne-Sophie recently to find out how she chose which films to include, as well as how she first encountered the music of John Williams.

James Longstaffe: It's clear from listening to the album how passionate an advocate you are of the music of John Williams, with your enthusiasm coming across so clearly in every piece: can you tell us how you first came across his music, and what made you fall in love with it?

Anne-Sophie Mutter: I fell in love with his music in 1978; I grew up in the Black Forest where Germany, France, and Switzerland meet and there was not much to do other than playing soccer and being in the woods and enjoying my violin lessons. We had a cinema, so at least that was something exciting! Then in 1978, shortly after I had made my debut with Herbert von Karajan, Star Wars arrived in the cinema, and I was totally blown away by the music. Although it was visually also sensational, what really stuck with me was the leitmotifs, the strong characters which he was able to depict in music. I was very struck by that because I grew up with the great music of people like Bernard Herrmann and Korngold, whose Violin Concerto and score for The Sea Hawk are obviously special. After that I used to go to movies when I knew that John would have written the score: sometimes I wasn't terribly interested in the subject, but I knew I could always close my eyes and know what was going on by just listening to this very rich-textured and stylistically diverse music.

I'm so envious of brass players; clearly John has a very soft spot for them, which made selection of the themes for my album and for the open-air concert quite demanding: Princess Leia, for example, wasn't originally intended for the violin, but as John himself says it becomes a totally different emotional experience.

Longstaffe: Of course you have a direct connection to Hollywood royalty through André Previn: I understand he used to tease Williams that he should stop wasting his time with all this film music and focus his efforts on so-called "serious" compositions instead. Do you think there is still a certain resistance to film music in the concert hall, and what do you think it is about Williams's music that has enabled it to make that transition more successfully than others?

Mutter: I think André probably would not have used the words "film music instead of serious music", because he himself lived in all these musical worlds which seem very different to most people: unlike many of us who are less gifted than he was, he lived in the world of music completely, so he could easily switch from jazz and film music to playing a Mozart piano concerto or conducting Richard Strauss. But I think the point André wanted to make is that John seems to be so totally busy with that part of the repertoire that his symphonic writing hasn't been given the space it deserves – though in fact he's composed about forty or fifty "classical" works, including two violin concertos and a cello concerto, and he's just written a piece for Yo-Yo [Ma], which premiered last summer in Tanglewood.

I think in English-speaking countries people are much more open-minded. Just over the weekend I was in London looking at the Casino Royale interactive screening, and it struck me how incredibly diverse the cultural scene in London is; my daughter has lived there for quite a while, and that kind of diversity and also appreciation for the theatre and musicals and opera seems to me to be very Anglo-Saxon. In Germany the division between the "serious" and the "unserious" is much more pronounced. So the reason I chose to do the first real open-air concert of John's music in Germany is not only because Germany is my home country: it also has to do with the reluctance that I think a big part of the audience has to accept that both worlds can have high craftsmanship. That is true for classical music as well as for film music, and there are fabulous new scores by John Williams as well as people like Jörg Widmann, so it is possible.

I'm always interested in enlarging my repertoire, and I have worked with so many living composers that when I came across John Williams in person I immediately thought "Wow, a violin concerto would be such a gift for the repertoire and for the next generation". Hopefully the moment will come when he has the time to address that issue, but for the time being I'm very happy with Markings [written for Anne-Sophie Mutter in 2017], which is also being recorded; it's not included on the CD, but will be released later on a special edition on LP. I cannot tell you how excited and honoured I am to be part of this project. It absolutely needs to be there because it's a fabulous piece; he takes it as seriously as everything else, and we wanted to take a broader look at how he treats the violin and its many different stylistic clothes.














Longstaffe: Alongside excerpts from Star Wars and Harry Potter it's great to see some less familiar works included on the album, particularly Cinderella Liberty, Dracula, and one of my favourite John Williams themes, Sabrina.

Mutter: Oh yes, Sabrina has a purity and it ennobles the film. One of my all-time favourites now is actually Cinderella Liberty; I just find Nice To Be Around [the love theme from the film] so immensely inspired, and the jazzy atmosphere is something which really taps into my passion for jazz. Sadly I've no talent for improvisation, but I've always thought that it is the most intelligent style of music-making – composing in the instant and being so responsive and so close to your musical partners and their musical ideas. One of André's gifts to me last Christmas was a special arrangement of Duke Ellington's Sophisticated Lady, and it was he who also suggested that we include Cinderella Liberty (which was a great surprise to me) and Dracula, which he remembered from decades ago and particularly admired.

Longstaffe: Several of the pieces have been fairly substantially reworked not just in terms of orchestration but also in form and structure. Did you have any involvement in the reshaping of these pieces, or any input into the solo part, perhaps for example, the cadenzas in Hedwig's Theme and Tintin?

Mutter: No, none whatsoever: John is such a perfectionist, and his knowledge of the violin is quite astounding, so there was simply no need. My only suggestion concerned Princess Leia's Theme, which was originally for French horn: I felt that the key didn't really exploit the brilliance and soaring quality of the violin, so I asked for it to be transposed upwards, so it could shine even more. I'm not 20 anymore, so I have worked with a lot of fabulous musicians and great composers, but still his understanding and knowledge and quest to be ever better is amazing. Sometimes I would complain slightly about passages which were uncomfortable or difficult... but I complained only to myself because Beethoven is uncomfortable and difficult too, and that's just part of being a musician; it's not supposed to be easy!














Longstaffe: Can you give us some insights as to what it's like to be part of a John Williams recording session, what his working methods are in the studio, and what qualities he brings as a conductor to his own music?

Mutter: First of all he trusts all of us, which is a great quality: not all conductors and composers do that when it comes to recording sessions. Many musicians these days, particularly the very young conductors, are too overly active, they don't trust you to play a phrase in the way it should unfold. John also rewrites constantly: even after our open-air concert in Tanglewood in July, he still rewrote a few sections, changing a few bars in the violin part of Dracula and a great deal of A Prayer for Peace [from Munich]. This project has been a long time in the making, because we started discussing it over two years ago, and he started to write just over a year ago; we rehearsed in March, we recorded in April, we performed in July, and he is still not finished with it! I am very intrigued by that and very in awe of the fact that although I find what he writes is perfect, he is going to go back and reset, re-orchestrate and rewrite. That's the sign of a real genius, and also obviously of a very humble person.

Longstaffe: Finally, with so many memorable themes that he has written across the decades, were there any particular favourites that you weren't able to fit on this album, and is there perhaps scope for a Volume Two? I would love to hear you play, for example, the Devil's Dance from The Witches of Eastwick!

Mutter: That's a very good question! I did play Devil's Dance in Tanglewood, and he's rewritten it to the extent that it's almost like a new piece. I'm going to perform it here in Munich soon, but he was in the process of rewriting it for me when we were recording in April, and I have to confess I was so overwhelmed by the 16 or 18 other pieces that I just wasn't able to get it ready – but Volume Two, who knows!

There are so many more themes I would have loved to play: some of them might never work out, like Catch Me if You Can, which I think is one of the best scores ever written. War Horse is so beautiful, and I would just love to play the main themes of Superman and Jurassic Park! I'm contemplating a world tour with John's music in 2022, when I've done more of these pieces, and I'm thinking I might just join the orchestra. There's such incredible intensity and depth and emotion that I don't want to only act as a soloist, I want to be part of the entire picture!

Source: prestomusic.com

Photos: Prashant Gupta / Deutsche Grammophon
























The album "Across The Stars" released on August 30 by Deutsche Grammophon.


More photos


See also



The best new classical albums: September 2019

A Confrontation With Music: Ivo Pogorelich's First Album In 21 Years

A Confrontation With Music: Ivo Pogorelich's First Album In 21 Years

Ivo Pogorelich. Photo by Bernard Martinez


















By Tom Huizenga

National Public Radio, US — August 22, 2019

Controversy has seemed to follow pianist Ivo Pogorelich at every move, even from the beginning. In 1980, when the 22-year-old whiz kid from Yugoslavia failed to reach the final round of the International Chopin Competition, the revered pianist Martha Argerich, who declared him a "genius", stormed off the jury in protest. Naturally, the dustup helped launch his career. With a brooding pout, movie star looks and a high-powered record deal, Pogorelich was an instant celebrity. He told one journalist he could get a review just by cleaning the dust off his piano.

But Pogorelich became polarizing. Blessed with a dazzling, seemingly effortless technique and a searching mind, the pianist routinely gave eccentric performances, pulling familiar music out of shape. In 2006, New York Times critic Anthony Tommasini closed a Pogorelich review by saying: "Here is an immense talent gone tragically astray. What went wrong?"

Now, at age 60, the mercurial artist is releasing his first album in 21 years, a recording of piano sonatas by Beethoven (Nos. 22 and 24) and Rachmaninov (Sonata No.2, revised version). With such a long hiatus – and Pogorelich's track record – the release demands a certain critical wrestling to the ground, in terms of his once-lauded genius, and of broader questions, including where performers draw the line between artistic freedom and obligation to the composer. Instead of a traditional review, I've called in two experts – Anne Midgette, chief classical critic at The Washington Post, and pianist Patrick Rucker, a critic for Gramophone magazine – who sat around a table with me to explore ideas far beyond the perfunctory thumbs up or down judgement. We started by recognizing our own critical baggage, then listened to the music – compared his performances to other pianists – and by the end, arrived at two clear points of view, but left plenty of questions to ponder.


The young phenom: Ivo Pogorelich, early in his career, when he was regularly
recording albums. He's just released his first album since 1998. Photo by Susesch Bayat



















(The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.)

Tom Huizenga: What was your first thought when you heard a new Ivo Pogorelich album was coming?

Anne Midgette: The print reviews I had read of his performances in the last couple of years were so shockingly unanimous in their sort of – well, horror is the wrong word. Pity, in just saying, "He's lost his technique; this is not professional". I was thinking of him as a train wreck, and wondering about the motivation behind the album.

So I approached it with a kind of voyeuristic curiosity. And with that in mind, it was not the train wreck I thought it was going to be. It was not somebody who is incapable of getting through a single phrase of the music. There's a lot to dig into. There's also a lot not to like if you don't want to like it. But it's not incompetent in the way that it sounded like it might be, according to past reviews of his 2015 London recital.

Patrick Rucker: I was thinking about what I know of his biography, and the death of his wife in 1996. It seemed to me that she, also being his teacher, was an important element in his artistic personality. I think back on the career as a whole. I was hoping for a development, a flowering or something. Could he have come into his own and become more of his own person?

Huizenga: I was pretty excited to hear of a new album. In the early 1990s, I was a fan of his Brahms recording, even though he played some of the music twice as slowly as what you'd consider a normal tempo, such that the architecture nearly collapsed. Going back to that album now, I can't say I'm as much of a fan as I was.

What about Pogorelich's choice of repertoire for this album? We've got a pair of arguably undervalued – maybe even unloved – Beethoven sonatas, Opp. 54 and 78, along with the Rachmaninov Second Piano Sonata in its revised version.

Midgette: It did seem to me he picked pieces that already had in them a certain tendency to wildness. Some of the stuff he does in music fits very well with the tender and explosive elements of these pieces. They're a good place to have a tantrum, if you will.

Huizenga: Right. In the opening measures of opus 54, Beethoven unfolds this beautiful Haydn-esque melody and then a sudden turn towards violence, with pounding double octaves and punchy accents. Patrick, these are Beethoven sonatas you've played yourself.

Rucker: It's true. Two less familiar Beethoven sonatas, certainly. The opus 78 is a gem, a masterpiece, particularly. But Beethoven and Rachmaninov is an unusual coupling. I think you could see, say, Chopin and Rachmaninov, or Rachmaninov and any of his compatriots perhaps. But it's an unusual thing. Maybe it's to show the variety he's capable of.

Huizenga: Now let's hear some of your overall thoughts after listening to the album closely.

Midgette: Once I was past the thing of, "OK, it's not the train wreck that those reviews led me to believe", I can't say that I was enraptured. But I thought, "It's legitimate". One of the painful things about hearing some of these interpretations in general is that the urge to put your own stamp on music that's been played 5,000 times almost necessarily leads you to be eccentric and excessive, because everything's been done. His feelings are all over this: It's very loud and then it's very poetic. He can do really, really slow, too. But I found a poignancy in the reading beyond my impulse to say, "That's not how it goes. That's not right".

The other sad thing is that, almost always, these individual, quirky readings lack all lightness or humor. There's this furrowed-brow insistence on getting your personality out there, and that's not what the music is really about.

Huizenga: We often find these eccentricities in younger players who are just emerging, just coming into their own, trying to stand out from the crowd. And we chalk it up to youth and figure they will mature. But listening to Pogorelich's album, I thought that the willful, very eccentric way he deals with tempos and dynamics has really been his path from the beginning.

Rucker: I find the approach to these performances so eccentric. If you want to have a really original focus on a piece of music, to make it completely your own, there's a process that goes into that – which is, you have to try like crazy to push everybody else's ideas out of your mind, and then look at the notes and so forth. But there are so many instances, particularly in the Beethoven Sonatas, where the rhythms are even misread. It's just so much a personal take, an eccentric take, on what's on the page.

Quite apart from the interpretation, I found the piano playing to be very brutal – ugly sounds which I don't think are necessarily a part of Rachmaninov. And that's the piece I was most focused on because I thought it had the greatest potential for personal expression for him. Also, I noticed that the life of the phrase – you can pull it just so far. It couldn't possibly be sung.

Huizenga: It's almost as if every short passage and/or phrase is under a microscope and has no relation to the phrase or passage before or after it.

Midgette: Which is, again, an ill of our time. Conductor Christoph Eschenbach does that. You're so focused on making the music of this phrase that you end up with a pile of ashes – of just phrases piled on top of each other.

Rucker: And I'd like to return to something you said, Anne: Not only is there no humor to it, there's no relief to it. It's relentless in its – I can't say urgency because it doesn't really sound urgent to me, but relentless in its intent.

Midgette: I felt Pogorelich's attempt to rip the skin off these things and sort of remind you of what it would sound like new, when Beethoven was first playing: the assault on the ears that it represented to people and the shock of that back then. I did think of deaf Beethoven pounding at the piano, and how people learning the music internalize the idea that Beethoven is clawing at the piano to make music. I think Pogorelich is getting at something in the pieces that is there. He wasn't totally off the rails in the way he approached it.

Huizenga: In the final movement of the Rachmaninov Sonata, especially, there are passages that rely on meticulously building tension, but in Pogorelich's hands that tension seems to vanish.

Midgette: He's building the tension in a different way. I don't think he feels the tension any less – he's kind of digging inside it. And it seems to me he's sort of pursuing his own thoughts about it rather than worrying about the effect it's going to make on the audience. The point of what he's doing is exploring himself, and anybody who wants to come along with him will come with him. But maybe the biggest drawback of the interpretation is the degree to which it's deliberately willful.

Huizenga: But are these willful interpretations valid?

Midgette: If you get up and play, it's valid. Pianist Tzimon Barto said this great thing to me once: "If I go up on the steps of the Acropolis and slit my wrists and yell and scream and pour red paint around, the Acropolis is fine; they can mop up the paint and it's not going to hurt the Acropolis. It's just me up there making a fool of myself". So that piece is not damaged by what Pogorelich does it to it. People may not want to listen to it; is that invalid because people don't like it?

Huizenga: Pogorelich is not certainly not the first eccentric. Look at all the opera singers from the pre-World War I era who put their very individual stamp on interpretations and did whatever they wished with tempos and added extra notes. Even closer to today, there are people like Glenn Gould. Personally, I can't bear hearing the first recording of the Goldberg Variations; it sounds like a sewing machine playing Bach. And then you've got wonderfully eccentric conductors like Teodor Currentzis and violinists like Patricia Kopatchinskaja.

Rucker: But Kopatchinskaja is communicating. There's no question that she is trying to say something to the audience. With Pogorelich, I don't get that. I feel like he's got this jigsaw puzzle in front of him and he's picking up each piece and staring at it. It doesn't sound to me like finished work.

Midgette: I feel like I'm hearing him find things. It doesn't all come together in something neat; I don't think he wants it to. He doesn't want to give you a big, finished, nicely put together jigsaw puzzle. Whether that's something everybody wants to listen to is another thing.

Now, does it represent the composer's intentions? We have so many directives about how we're supposed to play music. Look at the historically informed performance movement: One reason people are drawn to it is that there's more freedom – freedom to improvise and move within a wider spectrum and still be within the rules of how it's played. With the 19th-century repertoire, the rules are very codified.

Huizenga: And then there's the idea that you're not supposed to color outside the lines. In classical music we have these pieces written down and accepted as masterworks. Musicians are taught to play them within these strictures, and if you venture outside of them there's going to be a problem. Of course, there's nothing like that in jazz, where there's so much more reliance upon improvisation and individuality.

In the slow movement of Pogorelich's Rachmaninov, at one point I feel like we've just walked into a piano bar because the tempo is so relaxed. It takes on a kind of improvisatory feel, like, "Where is he going to go next?" But I don't exactly hate it.

Rucker: Maybe it's worth pointing out that we're so far removed from Beethoven, but with Rachmaninov, we know what he sounded like. We have recordings – not of this particular sonata – but we have an idea of what his ethos was as a performer and as a composer.

I remember a teacher of mine once said, "The beauty of Bach is that you can play it at any tempo". Well, no, you can't. It's a dance, or it's an aria, or it's one of these things that are recognizable from the depth of your understanding of the style. So does that matter? Are we redefining it for ourselves for a new age, which of course every age must? What's our obligation to the original?

Midgette: You say we know what Rachmaninov sounded like. But in jazz, if you know what Louis Armstrong sounds like and you want to play a Louis Armstrong song, the whole point is you take it over and make it your own rather than slavishly emulate. In classical music, the emphasis is all on slavishly emulating. And then we get very cookie-cutter performances and we wonder why audiences aren't coming.

Huizenga: And that's what a lot of people complain about today: There's a certain sameness to not only, say, violinists, but to orchestras as well. We're looking for individuality. So the question is, where are those lines between individuality, eccentricity and artistic failure? Patrick, I sense this album may be closer to an artistic failure in your mind.

Rucker: You know, in a way it is. If we want to use this music as a springboard, why don't you call it a "Fantasy on the Second Sonata of Rachmaninov?" I ask this sincerely, not sarcastically. I think there's a question of authorship and a question of curatorial responsibility. I also believe that you can hew the line down to the tiniest detail of what we have in the score and still have a vibrant and vital interpretation that will have people standing on their seats.

Midgette: Oh, there's no question that's possible. But the question is, when presented with something different, does one rule it out on the grounds of not playing by the rules? Last spring, I heard a mashup of the Verdi Requiem with Shakespeare's King Lear, with Lear played by a woman and the Requiem performed by eight voices. It was very honorable and fascinating. Now, it wasn't Lear because it was a one-woman monodrama; it wasn't by any of his rules and it wasn't the play. But I think in theater we have no problem understanding that it was Shakespeare. So to say it's inauthentic because Pogorelich is taking tempos slower – this is the kind of thing that makes people who are outside the classical field say, "Oh for God's sake!" If somebody new comes to it, whether or not they like it, it is a thing. It's a reading of Rachmaninov, an eccentric reading of Rachmaninov.

Huizenga: What value does the album have if it is presented to someone who has never before heard any of this music?

Midgette: I was wondering that as I was listening. It's quite close to home, too, because I have a 7-year-old and he likes contemporary music. He doesn't like my stuff at all and makes snap judgments about things.

One of the things people respond to – and people think is part of classical music, which drives me kind of crazy – is the "itness" of it all. And by that I mean the idea that classical music expresses only grand thoughts and grand feelings and needs performances writ large in capital letters. In a sense, Pogorelich's interpretations push that to a certain height. But I think that's something that new audiences who don't know much about classical music are also primed to want. And they're certainly going to find it in this recording.

Rucker: As far as the vitality of the expression we talked about in violinist Patricia Kopachinskaja: I'm there, I'm buying it. I don't care if she plays barefoot. Somehow she has internalized the message in a broad range of repertoire. She's internalized it that so it can just come out and speak. Pogorelich doesn't sound that way to me. It doesn't sound to me like he's internalized it. It sounds like he's not owned it, and he doesn't really love it.

Huizenga: It's hard to know what it means for an artist to chase an idea and document it in an album. We can't get inside Pogorelich's head, but you'd think he must have had some broad idea about what he wanted to say with these pieces – even if it was just, "I need to play them my way, and play them very differently".

Midgette: Patrick, what you said – it was such a beautiful way you put it – about you don't hear that he really loves it, that resonates with me. I think of hearing Evgeny Kissin play, and the way Kissin's mind works as an artist. He is dazzling and amazing; I don't always get that he loves what he plays. But as a criterion, while there is no question that Kopachinskaja has it, and that that's a wonderful thing, it does manifest differently for different people, especially for somebody who's been through this whole prodigy thing.

Huizenga: I want to read a recent quote that's right in line with what we've been talking about. In the Swiss paper Neue Zürcher Zeitung, the pianist Igor Levit was asked: "So, you are opposed to the widespread ideal according to which the interpreter is primarily the servant of the musical text?" And Levit answers: "I do not feel like a servant, not even a master of anyone. For me the question is not what would we be without the composers, but what would the composers be without us? The interpretation is my personal response to the information provided to me by the score".

Midgette: That's a really healthy way to look at it, because this state of servitude to the composer's wishes is fine if you really feel it, but it's become a template for the classical field – a field that needs more creativity and is really hungry for it.

Rucker: I think your diagnosis of the field is 100% right. We really need some fresh thought. I also have a quote I wanted to read, from the New Yorker critic Hilton Als, who recently wrote: "What you look for is just how committed players are to connecting with the audience through their craft, the skills that allow them to exhibit and illuminate the awfulness and the lushness of what it means to be a person in the world".

And I guess that's what I'm looking for. I'm not looking for the "correctness" of it. But I would like also to feel that if musicians are saying, "Here's Beethoven", "Here's Chopin", that somehow those characters are recognizable and not just a suit of clothing the musician puts on for their own pleasure. I want their motivation to be my pleasure.

Midgette: Although I did feel in this album that you're hearing somebody who's been through a lot, as far as "the awfulness" of being in the world.

Huizenga: You can hear the struggle?

Midgette: That's part of the "itness" of it all that I roll my eyes at. But yes, I think you can hear a kind of confrontation with the music. He's not taking any easy answers and he's not accepting it at face value. I thought a lot about why I respond to this more warmly than a concert I heard last year by Fazıl Say, who had some of the same characteristics in terms of sort of assaulting and redoing, and I find Pogorelich a lot more simpatico. Because Say was just loud, and Pogorelich does have poetry, even if he's stretching it like taffy.

Huizenga: Where does this all leave Pogorelich? It's been 21 years since his last album. Is there some of that "genius" – as Martha Argerich said of him in 1980 – left in his playing? Maybe flawed genius?

Rucker: I would love to hear more curiosity. I would love a deeper look in his music-making than I think he is willing to give us at this point, at age 60.

Midgette: Genius is a word that gets so thrown around in this field. Is he a serious piano player? Yes. Is he going to scale the heights and become a world phenom the way he was and be booked by every orchestra? No.

As a critic we're supposed to come up with thumbs up or thumbs down. I think the fact that we're sitting around the table discussing the album means that if you care about piano playing and you know anything about Pogorelich, you'll probably want to hear it. Is it a huge success, is it something you want to listen to again and again? I'm not sure. And I'm not sure where it leads him. I would hope he'd make a couple more albums before we write him off or hail his return based on this.

Rucker: Well, Anne is the wave of the future and I'm the old fuddy-duddy! [Everyone laughs]

Midgette: But it's actually really good to have the two perspectives. I think we had two clear points of view, and people will agree with one or the other.

Source: npr.org
























Ivo Pogorelich's new album of sonatas by Beethoven and Rachmaninov released on August 23 by Sony Classical.

The best new classical albums: August 2019























Recording of the Month

Carl Maria von Weber: Oberon

Libretto by James Robinson Planché

Clemens Kerschbaumer (Oberon), tenor
Mirko Roschkowski (Hüon von Bordeaux), tenor
Dorothea Maria Marx (Rezia), soprano
Grga Peroš (Scherasmin), baritone
Marie Seidler (Fatime), mezzo-soprano
Dmitry Egorov (Puck), countertenor
Roman Kurtz, narrator

Chor und Extrachor des Stadttheaters Giessen
Choral Conductor: Jan Hoffmann

Philharmonisches Orchester Giessen
Conductor: Michael Hofstetter

Recorded Live December 2016 and January 2017, at Stadttheater Gießen, Germany
Released on July 12, 2019 by Oehms Classics

For the specific atmosphere of Oberon, Michael Hofstetter found it crucial that the performance was played on the period instruments Weber composed for. In Giessen, he worked with four natural horns, natural trumpets, finely tuned trombones and not least flutes made of wood instead of metal. This produced an inexhaustible wealth of acoustic colors, enabling us to sensually experience what might really be meant by the concept of "German Romanticism" on the musical level.

Michael Hofstetter conducts at many well known opera houses, orchestras and festivals, include the Bavarian, the Hamburg, the Hanover and the Stuttgart State Operas, Theater an der Wien, the Royal Opera Copenhagen, the Welsh National Opera, the English National Opera, the Houston Grand Opera, the Canadian Opera Company Toronto and many others. Future engagements will see him again at the International Handel Festival in Halle, with Orchestre national d'Île-de-France in Paris and at the International Gluck Festival Nuremberg.

Source: prestomusic.com


Mari – Vladimir Martynov, Max Richter, Philip Glass, Pēteris Vasks, Jóhann Jóhannsson, Johann Sebastian Bach, Christian Badzura, Peter Gregson, Vladimir Martynov, Brian Eno & Jon Hopkins & Leo Abrahams & Hans-Joachim Roedelius & Dieter Moebius, and Clark

Mari Samuelsen, violin (G. B. Guadagnini, Turin 1773)

Konzerthausorchester Berlin
Conductor: Jonathan Stockhammer

Recorded October 2-6, 2018 at Konzerthaus, Berlin, and November 2-3, 2018 at Teldex Studios, Berlin
Released on June 7, 2019, by Deutsche Grammophon

Norwegian violinist Mari Samuelsen's debut for the Yellow Label is entitled simply MARI, and is set for international release on 7 June 2019. Recorded with the Konzerthausorchester Berlin and conductor Jonathan Stockhammer, the album explores the contradictions of contemporary life – the fact that, despite the excitement of city life and the convenience of instant communication and express travel, many of us still feel a need to ground ourselves in the peace and quiet of the natural world. Mari herself was born in rural Norway and goes back to the family farm as often as her schedule allows. She was keen, therefore, to choose a selection of music echoing the conflicting pulls on our time and energy.

At the emotional heart of the album is Bach's Chaconne in D minor, whose serenity Samuelsen has chosen to counter with the nervous agitation of "Knee Play 2" from Philip Glass' Einstein on the Beach. The rest of the programme of her DG debut grew organically from the seeds of Bach and Glass, tracing themes of change and renewal, from the increasingly complex variations of the Chaconne to the expansive melodic development of Clark's Mammal Step Sequence. The album also combines familiar repertoire with brand-new pieces from some of today's leading composers and musicians.

Mari tested different combinations of compositions, carefully considering the ways in which they related to one another and to the whole. The finished recording contains pieces as diverse as Vladimir Martynov's The Beatitudes, Peter Gregson's Sequence (Four), arrangements of Jóhann Jóhannsson's Heptapod B and Brian Eno's song By this River, and Pēteris Vasks' Vientulais Engelis (Lonely Angel). The mix also includes four works by Max Richter, with whom she collaborates on a regular basis, including Vocal, for solo violin, and the wonderfully hypnotic November.

As MARI reveals, Mari is an artist with a fresh and intelligent vision of the world. She respects the masterpieces of the past but is fearlessly adventurous when it comes to new repertoire and innovative musical partnerships. An advocate of creative communication and attentive listening, she understands that we all yearn for moments of quiet contemplation. "The need to go into a room and just listen to sound – almost like sound therapy – is bigger than ever", she observes. "People are hungry for it, and I wanted to use my creativity to collaborate and experiment with some of the great people living today. Slowing down, and people leaving their busy lives behind, is only going to become more important, so there will be more room for this type of collaboration, and this type of music, in the years to come."

Source: deutschegrammophon.com


Claude Debussy: String Quartet in G minor | Germaine Tailleferre: String Quartet | Maurice Ravel: String Quartet in F major

Stenhammar Quartet:
Peter Olofsson, violin
Per Öman, violin
Tony Bauer, viola
Mats Olofsson, cello

Recorded May 19-21 (Debussy) & September 27-29, 2016 (Tailleferre), and March 30-31, 2017 (Ravel) at the Petruskyrkan, Stockholm
Released on July 5, 2019, by Alba

On this new release one of Scandinavia's foremost string quartets, the Swedish Stenhammar Quartet, perform pieces by Claude Debussy, Germaine Tailleferre and Maurice Ravel. The quartet's previous recordings have been internationally praised by critics, and this new album will certainly be no exception. "The Stenhammar Quartet produces a clean and vibrant sound, they use a range of well-judged dynamics and the articulation is exceptionally good throughout". (MusicWeb International)

Germaine Tailleferre (1892-1983) was a member of the French group of composers known as Les Six. She composed only one string quartet, in 1917-1919, when Les Six were just making a name for themselves. The Tailleferre String Quartet is a sonatina-like work in three movements and has the gracefulness and understated languor of Ravel's Neoclassicism and Les Six. The first and second movements are vigilantly dreamy and at the end return to the beginning without more ado. The last movement tells a richly eloquent story with bizarre situations, dry humour and ambiguous sentiments.

Claude Debussy (1862-1918) and Maurice Ravel (1875-1937) both made one excursion into string quartet territory, producing a pair of works that both became highly popular items in the repertoire. As the model for his Quartet of 1902, Ravel took the one by Debussy completed some ten years earlier in 1893; hence the excitingly non-identical twins are mirrors of music described as impressionistic. The two quartets come closest to each other in their impishly saucy pizzicato scherzos, their down-to-earth tempo underlining their groovy sardonicism. They also both have slow movements with deep, deep pools and finales that, instead of being conventionally jubilant, draw together the work's thematic threads and leave a lasting impression of sullen intransigence.

The Stenhammar Quartet has been active since 2002. The works of Wilhelm Stenhammar naturally play a central part in the ensemble's programmes, but their repertoire ranges from Baroque to contemporary music. The quartet regularly commissions works from Nordic composers such as Sven-David Sandström and Bent Sørensen, and has also been the dedicatee and given first performances of works by composers from the USA and Great Britain. The SQ has recorded extensively for Swedish Radio and various record labels and the ensemble's previous discs have received nominations for the Swedish "Grammis" Awards. In 2009 the ensemble was commended by the Royal Swedish Academy of Music for its contributions to Swedish music.

Source: europadisc.co.uk


I found the Stenhammar Quartet's performance of these three string quartets thoroughly engaging and satisfying. The playing is always well-balanced, always presenting the subtle, nuanced mood of this music. Warmth and sensitivity are offered where appropriate, as well as the occasional rhapsodic abandon.

The sound  quality is excellent and allows the listener to appreciate every detail of the playing.  The liner notes, printed in English and Swedish, are informative.

On the one hand, this CD is yet another edition of the two most famous French string quartets, but on the other, there is the added value in the outstanding offering by Germaine Tailleferre. This latter is a worthy piece of chamber music that deserves to be in the repertoire alongside its better-known companions.

Source: John France (musicweb-international.com)


Dietrich Buxtehude: Membra Jesu nostri

Maria Keohane, Hanna Bayodi-Hirt, sopranos
Carlos Mena, countertenor
Jeffrey Thompson, tenor
Matthias Vieweg, baritone

Enrico Gatti, Maité Larburu, violins
Lucile Boulanger, Mathias Ferré, Salomé Gasselin, Philippe Pierlot, violes de gambe
Maggie Urquhart, bass
Daniel Zapico, theorbo
François Guerrier, organ

Ricercar Consort
Conductor: Philippe Pierlot

Recorded September 2016 at l'Abbaye de la Lucerne d'Outremer, France
Released on April 12, 2019 by Mirare

Over the past four decades, the Ricercar Consort has proven to be a formidable force in early-music performance whose reputation was founded on German Baroque music. It stands to reason, then, that the Belgian ensemble's new recording of Buxtehude cantatas would continue their legacy of excellence – and it does.

Dietrich (or Dieterich) Buxtehude (c. 1637-1707) has until relatively recently been best known for his keyboard works. He was a very well-known organist in his day, and the legend persists that Johann Sebastian Bach himself once traveled for over three hundred kilometers to hear him play. But Buxtehude was also a prominent and influential composer of vocal works, and more than 100 such compositions survive, a fact to be celebrated given that so many of his pieces were lost. Of all these vocal works, only one is dated by Buxtehude himself: The cycle of seven cantatas collectively called Membra Jesu nostri was dedicated to Gustav Düben, an organist, composer, and director of music to the King of Sweden, in 1680.

The fact that it is dated is not the only thing that sets this work apart. While the rest of Buxtehude's cantatas adhered to the Lutheran style of setting sacred works in German, Membra Jesu nostri is entirely in Latin – not a marker of Catholicism, but rather of the kind of musical erudition Buxtehude saw in Düben. Buxtehude wrote or compiled its text himself, largely from the Medieval hymn "Salve mundi salutare". The text of this hymn is divided into seven parts, and thus the work itself is divided into seven self-contained cantatas, each describing a different section of the crucified body of Jesus. In this respect, the piece is a musical counterpart to Martin Luther's sermons on the Passion of Christ, which emphasized both its ecstasy and its anguish.

So does the Consort. They show off their exquisite blend in movements such as the intimate, tortured "Vulnerasti cor meum", the gorgeously intense concerto "Quid sunt plagae istae", or the rocking lilt of "Salve, caput cruentatum", but also their great precision in the agitated off-beat accents of the concluding Amen. The much shorter concluding cantata Gott, hilf mir also gives them a chance to show off their more urgent side, over and against the pathos of the longer first work. If there were such a thing as a drawback here, it would be that the violas da gamba are so sparingly called for by Buxtehude that we only get to hear them in the "Ad cor" cantata.

Having performed the piece myself, there are moments in which their decisions on tempo or phrasing differ from what lives in my mind’s ear, but their choices are effective, suiting well both the works themselves and the particular construction of their ensemble. Vocalists and instrumentalists (and director) alike are to be commended for such a beautifully transparent, luminous performance, which certainly earns a high place in the field of Buxtehude recordings.

Source: Karen Cook (earlymusicamerica.org)


Wynton Marsalis: Violin Concerto | Fiddle Dance Suite

Nicola Benedetti, violin

The Philadelphia Orchestra
Conductor: Cristian Măcelaru 

Recorded November 2-4, 2017 at the Kimmel Center, Verizon Hall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S. (Violin Concerto), and March 27, 2019 at the Menuhin Hall, Stoke D'Abernon, Surrey, England (Fiddle Dance Suite)
Released on July 12, 2019 by Decca

Nicola Benedetti's new album on Decca Classics features premiere recordings of two works written especially for her by jazz musician Wynton Marsalis: Violin Concerto in D and Fiddle Dance Suite for Solo Violin.

Benedetti performs Violin Concerto in D with The Philadelphia Orchestra under the baton of Cristian Măcelaru who has collaborated with the violinist to perform the work six times. The concerto was co- commissioned by the London Symphony Orchestra (LSO), Ravinia, LA Philharmonic, National Symphony Orchestra Washington, Gewandhausorchester Leipzig and Netherlands Radio Philharmonic. Benedetti performed the world premiere with the LSO under conductor James Gaffigan in London in November 2015.

Marsalis' Violin Concerto in D is in four movements and draws on the entire sweep of Western violin pieces from the Baroque era to the 21st Century. It explores Benedetti's and Marsalis' common musical heritage in Celtic, Anglo and Afro-American folk music and dance. The work revels in the magic of virtuosity and takes inspiration from Nicola's life as a travelling performer and educator. Each of the four movements reveals a different aspect of Nicola's dream which becomes a reality through the long-form storytelling of the performance.

Wynton Marsalis commented, "Nicky said she wanted a piece that would allow her to inhabit an expansive range of human emotions. Though I have long loved the violin, she schooled me in its august history, in its tremendous expressive capabilities, and in a compendium of old and new techniques. From a very young age, Nicky's dream was to move people with the magic of virtuosity and the warmth of her sound. The concerto begins with her telling us the story of her dream, the playing of it IS the realization of that dream, and it ends with her going down the road to play for the next gathering".

Nicola Benedetti commented, "This project has been a deeply edifying experience – one I will always reflect on with immense gratitude. It has been a privilege to learn and perform these two inspired and unequivocal masterpieces, and to deepen my understanding of Wynton's compositional language, cultural richness and philosophical insights. These compositions take us from the introspection of a Spiritual to the raucous celebration of a Hootenanny, from a lullaby to a nightmare, and from a campfire to a circus. We travel far and wide to distant corners of the world, the mind and the soul. Long-form musical pieces are often described as a journey. This sure has been a rich and fascinating one, and I am thrilled to now share the results with you".

Source: highresaudio.com


[...] The second piece, Fiddle Dance Suite for solo violin, reflects the music of traditional dance styles. The five movements – "Sidestep Reel", "As the Wind Goes", "Jones' Jig", "Nicola's Strathspey" and "Bye-Bye Breakdown" – include a hoedown, jig, reel and hornpipe.

Benedetti said, "It has been a privilege to learn and perform these two inspired and unequivocal masterpieces, and to deepen my understanding of Wynton's compositional language, cultural richness and philosophical insights. These compositions take us from the introspection of a Spiritual to the raucous celebration of a Hootenanny, from a lullaby to a nightmare, and from a campfire to a circus. We travel far and wide to distant corners of the world, the mind and the soul".

Nicola Benedetti is one of the most respected violinists of her generation and one of the most influential classical artists of today. She frequently performs with major orchestras and conductors across the globe. Benedetti was appointed a Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE) in the 2019 New Year Honours List, for services to music, and was the Winner of the Best Classical Award at The Global Awards 2019.

Wynton Marsalis is an internationally acclaimed musician, composer, bandleader, educator and a leading advocate of American culture. He is the world's first jazz artist to perform and compose across the full jazz spectrum from its New Orleans roots to bebop to modern jazz. He has expanded the vocabulary for jazz and created a vital body of work that places him among the world's finest musicians and composers.

Source: Sharon Kelly (udiscovermusic.com)


Changyong Shin plays Ludwig van Beethoven, Franz Liszt & Frédéric Chopin

Changyong Shin, piano

Recorded January 22-23, 2019 at Steinway Hall, New York City
Released on July 5, 2019 by Steinway and Sons

Changyong Shin's 2018 solo debut CD on the Steinway & Sons label featured a performance of Beethoven's Op.101 sonata that revealed this young pianist's affinity for the composer's linear aesthetic, if not necessarily the combative emotional subtext behind the notes. One can say the same vis-à-vis Shin's reading of Beethoven's Op.109, the opening salvo on his second Steinway release.

Shin conveys the first movement's improvisatory qualities well. His Prestissimo is contrapuntally aware and mostly clear, but without the litheness and dynamism one hears from Annie Fischer, Freddy Kempf, Igor Levit, and Stewart Goodyear. Although Shin's phrasing of the opening theme of the third-movement variations suggests little of the music's implicit calm and repose, piano mavens will notice his careful voice leading – and does Shin employ the una corda pedal on the repeats? Variation 2's broken rhythms come off uniformly genial rather than tension inducing, while Variation 3 is too sedate and studio-bound for such helter-skelter music. Shin clarifies Variation 5's difficult counterpoint with the utmost technical ease and sophistication. If his long chains of trills in Variation 6 don't reach Claudio Arrau's ecstatic heights, Shin compensates by way of a stronger-than-usual left hand presence.

Of Shin's three Chopin Waltzes, his superbly characterized and pianistically poised Op.42 stands out. By contrast. Op.18 contains a good number of fussy and ultimately ineffective expressive gestures, while Op.34 No.1 is melody-oriented at the expense of strong rhythmic backbone. However, Shin completely connects with Liszt's Bénédiction, unquestionably this disc's high point. He unifies Liszt's potentially sprawling opus with a fluid basic tempo for the outer sections that still manages to suggest spaciousness, while shaping the melodic line and undulating double-note accompanying patterns in gorgeously three-dimensional perspective. What is more, Shin's use of rubato enhances transitions and moments of felicitous harmonic interest. The Bénédiction is vulnerable to its interpreters, and can sound deadly and interminable in the wrong hands, but emphatically not here. Shin should record more Liszt.

Source: Jed Distler (classicstoday.com)


Passionate, inspired performances and brilliant technique are the hallmark of pianist ChangYong Shin. He brings those qualities to meditative yet virtuosic works by Beethoven, Liszt and Chopin. With performances in South Korea, Italy, France, the UK, and across the United States, and a growing reputation for compelling interpretations, Mr. Shin is developing an international career as a soloist and chamber musician. Mr. Shin released his debut album on the Steinway & Sons label in January 2018. Comprising works by Bach, Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven, the acclaimed album was listed as one of the "Best New Recordings of 2018" by WQXR. Shin began piano studies at the Yewon School in South Korea, then at the Korea National Institute for the Gifted in Arts. In 2011, he emigrated to the United States to study at the Curtis Institute of Music under Robert McDonald, where, as a recipient of a Paul G. Mechklin Scholarship, he received his Bachelor of Music in May 2016. In 2018, he earned a Master of Music degree from the Juilliard School, where he is currently enrolled in the Artist Diploma Program.

Source: hdtracks.com


Richard Strauss: Don Quixote & Sonata for cello and piano

Daniel Müller-Schott, cello
Herbert Schuch, piano

Melbourne Symphony Orchestra
Conductor: Sir Andrew Frank Davis

Recorded January 17, 2019, Köln, Deutschlandfunk, Kammermusiksaal (tracks 1-5), & June 21-26, 2017, Melbourne, Hamer Hall Arts Centre (tracks 6-19)
Released on July 12, 2019 by Orfeo

We have rarely heard this work [Sonata] in such an exciting and rhetorical performance. Müller-Schott's and Schuch's playing is unusually free. Both musicians stimulate each other and remain permanently in a lively dialogue. The virtuoso passages sound fresh and with youthful verve, the intimate, beautiful moments of the second movement are very cantabile. In Don Quixote the musicians from Melbourne show an impressive orchestral refinement, and Andrew Davis succeeds in upgrading many passages that otherwise never become so clear. In addition, the conductor's distinct sense of drama gives the piece an immense rhetorical power and a great inner tension. The rich colours are splendid, the nuances are enchanting, the contrasts invigorating. A highlight is the absolutely grotesque fight against the herd of sheep. But it is not only the orchestral playing that fascinates. A determining element in the wonderful, very characteristic performance is the cellist Daniel Müller-Schott, whose playing is beautifully lyric and intensive. In the violist Christopher Moore, he has an excellent and expressive partner.

Source: Remy Franck (pizzicato.lu)


During his long and exceptionally fruitful creative life, Richard Strauss composed only a few works for the cello. Only three have survived and small as that number may seem, those cello works are critical to the composer's development. Daniel Müller-Schott sees the early Sonata for cello and piano in F major, Op.6, and the late tone poem "Don Quixote", Op.35, as marking the path that was to lead Strauss within the space of a few years from Romanticism to the Modern era in music. The cellist highlights this watershed in Strauss' artistic development with his own transcriptions, expressly made for this album, of the Lieder "Zueignung", Op.10 No.1, and "Ich trage meine Minne", Op.32 No.1.

Source: chandos.net


Albums that combine symphonic and chamber music are often very popular because they allow you to discover two complementary styles of music that aren't always listened to to the same extent. The marvellous German cellist Daniel Müller-Schott composed his last recording under the guidance of Richard Strauss and has decided to present the works in this series chronologically, beginning with the Sonata Op.6 composed by Strauss at the tender age of nineteen. Two Lieder transcribed for cello and piano are then followed by Strauss' greatest work for cello, his immense poem Don Quichotte for symphonic orchestra (with James Ehnes on lead viola). The cherry on top of the cake would have been the addition of the Romanze for cello and orchestra, a contemporary sonata that would be the perfect addition here.

Source: François Hudry (qobuz.com)


The albums were chosen by the owner and blog editor of "Faces of Classical Music", Alexandros Arvanitakis.












More photos


See also


The best new classical albums: January 2020

The best new classical albums: December 2019

The best new classical albums: November 2019

The best new classical albums: October 2019

The best new classical albums: September 2019

The best new classical albums: July 2019

The best new classical albums: June 2019

The best new classical albums: May 2019


The best new classical albums: April 2019


The best new classical albums: March 2019


The best new classical albums: February 2019


The best new classical albums: January 2019


The Faces of Classical Music Choose the 20 Best Albums of 2019

The Faces of Classical Music Choose the 20 Best Albums of 2018


The best new classical albums: July 2019























Recording of the Month

1939 – William Walton: Concerto for Violin and Orchestra in B minor | Karl Amadeus Hartmann: Concerto funèbre (Funereal Concerto) for Violin and String Orchestra | Béla Bartók: Violin Concerto No.2 in B major

Fabiola Kim, violin


Münchner Symphoniker

Conductor: Kevin John Edusei

Recorded November 5-8, 2018 (Walton, Bartók) and January 23-24, 2019 (Hartmann) at Bavaria Musikstudios Munich
Released on June 21, 2019 by Solo Musica

The Korean-American violinist Fabiola Kim has earned herself an excellent reputation far beyond her native regions. While she has long been regarded as one of the strongest talents of her young generation in the United States with appearances at Carnegie Hall and the Aspen Festival – the New York Times celebrates her as "a brilliant soloist... with extraordinary precision and luminosity" – she has also been able to amaze critics and audiences on numerous European concert stages.


With 1939 now her impressive debut appears, whose program not only demands tremendous musicality, but also historical awareness and sensitivity. Under the baton of Kevin John Edusei, she has recorded with the Munich Symphony Orchestra violin concertos by Walton, Hartmann and Bartók, all of which were written in the year that provides the title – works by composers with very different styles and musical spheres of their own. The concerts reveal in the music and their spiritual attitude both closeness and distance to the historical turning point of 1939 – before the great global conflagration.


Béla Bartók, who with his folkloristic music strived for nothing less than a "brotherhood of peoples", had already suffered under the rapprochements of the Hungarian right-wing government to the Nazi regime and was also directly affected by the political development at the latest with the annexation of Austria, where his publishing house Universal Edition was located. Torn between emigration and remaining in his homeland, Bartók initially escaped into work. He wrote his 2nd Violin Concerto for his befriended violinist Zoltán Székely. It represents a wonderful compromise between Bartók's modern imagination and the client's desire for a "classical" concert.


Karl Amadeus Hartmann, a native of Munich, was most directly affected by the political darkening in Germany: "The standstill in creative activity was accompanied by the fear of what was to come, the unimaginable, the rule of the demon had come to pass, seemingly established for the duration". Hartmann remained in Germany and chose inner emigration. The events of 1939 represent the starting point of his Concerto funèbre, which he conceived as funeral music and accusation against the tyranny of the National Socialists: "This period indicates the fundamental character of my piece and the background to it. The dire outlook at that time for all that war spiritual was to be challenged by an expression of confidence in the two chorales at the beginning and at the end".


The situation was quite different with the creation of Walton's Violin Concerto, which was composed at that time in Italy and the USA far from the threat of war. After Walton had flirted with modern trends in the 1920s and had risen to become the "enfant terrible" of the English avant-garde, he followed in later works a more subtle tone a more subtle tone of lyrical quality in the neo-Romantic style, as he does in the Violin Concerto. He had received the commission for the composition from none other than Jascha Heifetz, who premiered the work in Cleveland in December 1939 with great success – thus Walton was now also affected by the political events, unable to attend the premiere of his work after the outbreak of World War II.


Source: web.no-te.com/portfolio-item/fabiola-kim/



Ludwig van Beethoven: Sonatas for Cello and Piano

Leonard Elschenbroich, cello
Alexei Grynyuk, piano

Recorded January 7, 8, 10 & 11, and April 18 & 20, 2017 at Deutschlandfunk
Released on May 3, 2019 by Onyx Classics

There's little in Beethoven's output that’s undervalued but I have the sense that the cello sonatas don't quite get the respect they deserve. The pair of Op.5 show the young composer flexing his creative muscles in vast sonata structures that teem with ideas and incident; Op.69 is a veritable melodic feast; and Op.102's two are wondrously weird.

In Leonard Elschenbroich and Alexei Grynyuk's hands, these sonatas' staggering invention is impossible to ignore. The musicians' success comes, at least in part, from scrupulous attention to the composer's markings in matters of dynamics and articulation. Listen to the expectant hush with which they play the beginning of Op.5 No.1 – and note, too, how Elschenbroich sneaks into a crescendo so it seems to come out of nowhere. Or turn to the opening Andante of Op.102 No.1, rendered with such rapt yearning that it sounds as if it's being dreamily improvised.

Dynamic contrasts are starkly defined throughout, further sharpening musical characterisations. They wring every last ounce of drama from the central Allegro molto of Op.5 No.2, for example, and although they play both repeats, there's no slackening of tension or feeling of protraction. I was particularly riveted by the cellist's fervid phrasing in the repeat of the development section (at 9'05"), where he digs in even deeper than the first time around. His sound isn't especially plummy – there's a slight (and, I think, endearing) nasal quality to it – but his legato is seamless and he's not shy about roughing up his tone when called for, as in the two Trios of Op.69's Scherzo.

Indeed, Elschenbroich and Grynyuk find a wealth of textural variety in these sonatas. Grynyuk's touch can be astonishingly delicate and is unfailingly articulate. I love the rhythmic buoyancy both musicians bring to the rondos of Op.5 No.2 and Op.69 – whose ebullience borders on the giddy – and by Op.102 No.2's concluding Allegro fugato, where they step lightly and with unfailing grace through exceptionally intricate polyphony.

They can drive the music hard in fast movements, although their playing always breathes naturally. In a few places, I feel the breaths between thematic sections are held a hair too long. And in the slender slow introduction to Op.69's finale their phrasing feels a bit fussy when heard alongside, say, Rostropovich and Richter (Philips, 4/95).

Unlike many other recordings of the complete sonatas, Elschenbroich and Grynyuk eschew the sets of variations, offering instead a delightful account of the Horn Sonata in an arrangement likely made by the composer himself. The balance between the instruments ever so slightly favours the piano, and in some forte passages I wish the cello had greater presence. But this is a very minor complaint in the face of such superb music-making.

Source: Andrew Farach-Colton (gramophone.co.uk)


Marc-Antoine Charpentier: Histoires Sacrées

Ensemble Correspondances
Conductor: Sébastien Daucé

Recorded October & December 2016 at MC2: Grenoble et Maison de la Culture, Amiens, France
Released on April 12, 2019 by Harmonia mundi

This is superb. Here is a generous selection of sacred pieces by Charpentier, impeccably performed by Ensemble Correspondances under Sébastien Daucé. Most were composed at the behest of the Duchess de Guise, Charpentier's deeply religious employer, whose household included a substantial complement of singers and instrumentalists. The CDs include three substantial histoires sacrées, each one lasting between 30 and 40 minutes. All have named characters, the story entrusted to one or more narrators. The first is Cecilia, Virgin and Martyr, probably composed in 1677. Cecilia's husband and his brother Tiburtius, having converted to Christianity, are executed by Almachius. Cecilia then suffers the same fate. The drama proceeds swiftly, with a touch of Monteverdian stile concitato; the final chorus celebrates Cecilia as the patron saint of music, reeling off the "well-tuned cymbals" and other instruments familiar from Psalm 150. Nicolas Brooymans's forceful Almachius has a true match in the robustly defiant Cecilia of Judith Fa.

Next comes the grim tale, familiar from many an Old Master, of Judith, who saved the city of Bethulia from capture by gaining admission to the tent of Holofernes, the Assyrian commander, and cutting off his head as he slept. Composed in 1675, the piece starts suddenly with a chorus of Assyrians. Perhaps a prelude is missing; but the effect is of Charpentier bursting to tell the story. Caroline Weynants is by turns challenging, faux-submissive and triumphant; and one can't help but feel sorry for Renaud Bres's eminently reasonable Holofernes. The two parts are separated by "Night", ravishingly played by three bass viols: a picture in sound that looks forward to Orpheus's "Cessez, cessez, fameux coupables" in La descente d'Orphée aux enfers. As in Caecilia, there's a final chorus of jubilation.

The third of these concert mini-dramas is The Death of Saul and Jonathan, composed around 1682. The latter doesn't appear but Saul does, starting with his visit to the Witch of Endor. The mezzo Lucile Richardot is very fine as the witch, raising Samuel in what is virtually a scena in itself. Nicolas Brooymans, a very palpable ghost, is accompanied by the buzzing sound of a regal. The chorus has striking harmonic clashes at "acerba" (grievous) and "amara" (bitter) when lamenting the deaths; David's own lament for Jonathan, beautifully sung by David Cornillot, is underpinned by violins, recorders and those plangent viols. The whole work is on a par with an equally dramatic piece, Purcell's magnificent "In guilty night", which appeared some 10 years later.

The shorter numbers include Dialogues: Christ and Mary Magdalene, Christ and sinners, Christ and mankind. The last of all is the most unusual. The Plague at Milan, which dates from 1679, was written in honour of Cardinal Charles Borromeo, star of the Council of Trent and a character in Pfitzner's opera Palestrina. He is praised for the piety, humility and charity which led him to tend the sick during an outbreak of a "horrenda pestis" in 1576. According to Thomas Leconte's booklet note, these exemplary characters all reflect the ideals and aspirations of the Counter-Reformation.

A splendid anthology; and what makes the set even more desirable is the so-called DVD bonus. The performance is not the same as on the CDs. Filmed in 2016 in the Chapelle Royale at Versailles, it consists of a dramatisation of two of the substantial histoires sacrées and four shorter pieces, one of which – the antiphon In odorem unguentorum, H51 – is not listed in the booklet. Aurélie Maestre's set design is simplicity itself: a rocky outcrop which can be split in two, a flight of steps, a tree. Vincent Huguet bases his production around Mary Magdalene, Judith and Cecilia. During the viol-infused "Night" interlude, Judith is dressed by her maid. As she lies on the bed with Holofernes, the camera focuses on their entwined hands; the maid, when describing the murder, holds the bag containing the severed head. But why, at the end, does Davy Cornillot's Ozias present Judith with a cloth of honour and then contemptuously veil her? Not surprisingly, she throws it in his face and storms off.

In Caecilia, Étienne Bazola's Valerian shows a distinct lack of enthusiasm when Cecilia insists on preserving her virginity, but they get married all the same. The chorus of believers celebrate the conversion of the two men with simple gesturing. In Part 2 Almachius physically attacks Cecilia while threatening her, a shocking moment. The last piece is another antiphon, Sub tuum praesidium, H28, for three voices unaccompanied, Cecilia holding Judith and Mary Magdalene in a tender embrace. It's a sublime ending. Do not miss these wonderful performances.

Source: Richard Lawrence (gramophone.co.uk)


Franz Schubert: Late Piano Works, Vol. I – Piano Sonatas No.20 (D.959), No.4 (D.537), & Allegretto in C minor (D.915)

Andrea Lucchesini, piano

Recorded November 10-13, 2018 at Leibniz Saal, Hannover Congress Centrum
Released on June 7, 2019 by audite Musikproduktion

Andrea Lucchesini has called Franz Schubert's late piano works his "recent great love". Now he acts out this love in three albums for audite – masterful performances by the renowned Italian pianist whose interpretations are informed by his expertise in Beethoven as well as musical modernism.

Italy tends not to be considered as a cradle of pianism in the same way as are Russia, Austria or, more recently, China. Since 1945 only a small number of Italian pianists have reached top international standards – they include Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli and his pupil Maurizio Pollini, or Maria Tipo and her pupil Andrea Lucchesini who was born in 1965 in Tuscany and caused a sensation at an early age. Even then, he mastered the great repertoire. But because, for Lucchesini, music knows no limits, he has always promoted the revolutionaries around Arnold Schoenberg as well as his compatriot Luciano Berio. And studying musical modernism has, naturally, informed Lucchesini's approach to his favourite composers of the past, Ludwig van Beethoven and Franz Schubert.

Audite have now managed to win over the Florentine master pianist for a three-part recording series dedicated to his impressive interpretations of late Schubert works. The series opens with two sonatas that are closely linked to one another, alongside the atmospheric Allegretto in C minor, D.915 of 1827. The Sonata in A minor, D.537, written when Schubert was twenty years old, features a dance-like melody to which he would return eleven years later when he worked on his mature Sonata in A major, D.959. The reworking of the theme highlights the distance between Schubert's middle and late creative periods. What is initially a rousing, though slightly traditional tune, later appears embedded in a richer harmonic framework, but also in a more virtuosic form, at times almost transfigured.

It is this compositional and emotional range in Schubert's music that is especially fascinating to Andrea Lucchesini. "One recognises the difference between the artist who entertained his friends at social gatherings, and the composer working in solitude – without any prospect of publishing or performing his works, completely confined to his internal world where he felt many precipices. One has to take a plunge into his emotional labyrinth, not only to become intoxicated with his fabulous themes, but also to recognise their infinite variations that take one's breath away. This is how the work of a performer became a complete immersion for me."

Vol. II, featuring Piano Sonata No.21 and Drei Klavierstücke, D.946, will be released in spring 2020. Vol. III, presenting Piano Sonata No.18 & Sonata No.19, is scheduled for release in autumn 2020 and will complete the recording series of Schubert's late piano works.

Source: highresaudio.com


Johann Sebastian Bach: Goldberg Variations, BWV 988 (Performing version by Trio Zimmermann)

Trio Zimmermann:
Frank Peter Zimmermann, violin (Antonio Stradivarius, Cremona 1711, "Lady Inchiquin")
Antoine Tamestit, viola (Antonio Stradivarius, Cremona 1672, "Mahler")
Christian Poltéra, cello (Antonio Stradivarius, Cremona 1711, "Mara")

Recorded August & September 2017 and June 2018 at St.-Osdag-Kirche, Neustadt-Mandelsloh, Germany
Released on June 7, 2019 by BIS

For close to 300 years Bach's Goldberg Variations have awed performers as well as listeners, through an unparalleled combination of a dazzling variety of expression and breath-taking virtuosity with stupendous polyphonic mastery. No wonder then that other musicians than harpsichordists have wanted to make it their own  pianists, first and foremost, but also accordion players and guitarists, flautists and harpists.

Having performed and recorded much of the classical as well as the modern string trio repertoire, Trio Zimmermann began working on the Goldberg Variations several years ago, playing an existing arrangement. But in their own words, the three members – among the leading string players of our time  "soon became captivated by the original score and its innumerable beauties and details". As a result they have jointly prepared a performing version which here receives its first recording. Playing an important part on this disc are also the Trio's instruments  all by Antonio Stradivarius, and featured in close-up on the cover.

Source: bis.se


Lieder – Johannes Brahms, Robert Schumann and Gustav Mahler

Renée Fleming, soprano
Hartmut Höll, piano

Münchner Philharmoniker
Conductor: Christian Thielemann

Recorded January 17, 19 & 20, 2017 at Italian Institute of Culture, Budapest (tracks 1-16) and October 21, 22 & 24, 2010 at Philharmonie im Gasteig, Munich (tracks 17-21)
Released on June 14, 2019 by Decca

Four-time Grammy winning soprano Renée Fleming releases her first full-length lieder album for almost two decades on 14 June. The release date coincides with her London musical theatre debut, performing the role of Margaret Johnson in the Tony-winning musical The Light In The Piazza at the Royal Festival Hall.

Renée Fleming's new album Lieder, spanning six decades of German song, features songs by Brahms, Schumann, and Mahler, each of whom bring Romantic poetry to life. Fleming is partnered by her long-standing artistic collaborator Hartmut Höll on piano for songs by Brahms, including the beloved Brahms' "Lullaby", and also for Schumann's "Frauenliebe Und-Leben". She is joined by Christian Thielemann and the Munich Philharmonic for a performance of Mahler's "Rückert Lieder".

"I love lieder for the marriage of poetry and music that allows both profound emotion and the most intimate, nuanced expression", said Renée Fleming. "The German lied is, for me, both the foundation and the pinnacle of song literature. I am especially excited to have been able to collaborate with some of the greatest interpreters in the world for this repertoire."

Renée Fleming, the world's most beloved soprano, appears on the world's leading opera stages and concert halls. Winner of the U.S. National Medal of Arts and Female Artist of the Year at the 2018 Classic Brit Awards, the "people's diva" has been sought after for numerous distinguished occasions, from the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony to the Diamond Jubilee Concert for HM Queen Elizabeth II at Buckingham Palace.

"Song has come alive for her." (Financial Times)

"Tonal beauty was allied to honestly affecting interpretation." (Daily Telegraph)

Source: highresaudio.com


Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart: Piano Concertos Nos. 20 & 21, and Overture to "Don Giovanni"

Jean-Efflam Bavouzet, piano

Manchester Camerata
Conductor: Gábor Takács-Nagy

Recorded September 7-8, 2018 at The Stoller Hall, Hunts Bank, Manchester
Released on May 31, 2019 by Chandos

These miraculous works from the Lenten season of 1785 may be the two Mozart concertos most commonly paired on disc. Listeners who have heard and enjoyed the previous three volumes in this series (11/16, 10/17, 12/18), however, might have come to expect something a little special from these musicians. They won't be disappointed, either.

Concertos Nos. 20 and 21 represent the ultimate synthesis in Mozart's mature style, with peaks of technique, inspiration and creative personality conspiring to create works of unprecedented individuality and expressive depth. They form an ideal pair, contrasting the majesty of trumpet-laden C major with the anguished Sturm und Drang of dark D minor. The playfulness of No 21's outer movements encloses one of Mozart's most sublime creations – the inimitable slow movement that once linked the work with a Swedish B movie. Bavouzet and the Manchester Camerata are ideally poised in the fast music, with the conversational interplay between piano and woodwinds displaying the naturalness that is an evident hallmark of this cycle. In performance the Andante is often either dragged out and overburdened with an ersatz "expression" that it can't bear, or trotted through in an effort to avoid doing just that. Here, Gábor Takács-Nagy sets the ideal tempo – a touch slower than Zacharias for Jan Lisiecki (DG, 9/12) and faster than Marriner for Yeol Eum Son (Onyx, 6/18), to take two recent ish recordings – while Bavouzet doesn't so much sing the cantabile melody as croon it, delaying the down-beats like a nightclub singer and ornamenting liberally. It's a highly personal take on this all-too-familiar piece, to be sure, and I love it.

The Don Giovanni Overture makes you catch your breath as it bursts in after the effervescent close of K.467, making the Camerata sound like a far bigger band than their numbers suggest. The ground is thus prepared for the D minor of K.466, played with the same acuity and charisma as the C major Concerto, even if the central Romance is sung straighter, without the lubricious liberties of the C major's Andante.

This series of discs is shaping up to be a serious front-runner in a cycle of works that has never wanted for fine recordings. Cadenzas are by Beethoven (K.466) and, less predictably, Friedrich Gulda (K.467). For this concerto pairing, there are few recordings as fine.

Source: David Threasher (gramophone.co.uk)


Dmitri Shostakovich, Alfred Schnittke, Sergei Prokofiev: Cello Sonatas

Santiago Cañón Valencia, cello
Katherine Austin, piano

Recorded July 1-5, 2014 at Gallagher Academy of Performing Arts, Waikato University, Hamilton, New Zealand
Released on May 17, 2019 by Atoll

Born in Bogotá in 1995, Santiago Cañón Valencia has been praised as one of the most promising young cellists of his generation. His major musical mentors have been Henrik Zarzycki in Colombia and James Tennant in New Zealand. He began winning major prizes in International competitions from the age of 11 including the Carlos Prieto (2006), Adams (2009), Beijing (2010), Gisborne and Johansen (2012), and the Lynn Harrell and Pablo Casals (2014). He has performed as soloist and in recital throughout Australasia, the USA, South America, South Africa, Europe and Russia and has previously recorded a highly praised debut CD of solo 20th century works in 2012.

Currently Head of Piano at the Conservatorium of Music, University of Waikato, in Hamilton NZ, Katherine Austin was the winner of the inaugural New Zealand Young Musician of the Year competition and the NZ National Piano Award, both in 1982. Her principal mentors included Janetta McStay, Bryan Sayer and Irina Zaritskaya. She has performed as soloist in NZ with all the major orchestras including the NZSO and Auckland Philharmonia, and performs regularly in Europe, Australasia, China and the Americas as the pianist of the New Zealand Chamber Soloists and the Tennant-Austin Duo. Between 2008 and 2016 Katherine and Santiago have performed in over 100 concerts together.

Shostakovich composed the Sonata Op.40 in 1934, a few months after the original version of his controversial Lady Macbeth of Mtsensk was produced in Leningrad. Stung by the cruel official disapproval of his "decadent" opera, Shostakovich practically abandoned stage and film composition, devoting himself to instrumental music. On Christmas day of that year he gave the first performance of the Sonata with his friend Viktor Kubatsky, cellist of the Stradivarius Quartet and Bolshoi Theatre, to whom the score is dedicated. The Sonata consists of four movements. The first movement places the cello in a lyric role with a primarily secondary piano accompaniment. This movement is in sonata-allegro form; Shostakovich spends much time establishing each theme individually to create a clearer contrast between moods. The second movement's foot-stomping dance, with its ethereal glissandi in the cello's upper register, suggests a manic perpetual motion machine. The third movement, almost bordering in stasis, is perhaps one of the most introspective works in the cello repertoire. In the fourth movement, there is a return to the irony and sarcasm, focusing on music that is grotesque and irreverent.

Alfred Schnittke dedicated this sonata to the famous cellist Natalia Gutman. The three movements are set in a somewhat non-conventional form: Largo - Presto - Largo. The opening Largo is melancholic in character, rotating around C minor but always evading a resolution. Schnittke continues to explore major/minor changes in the furious Presto. Meticulously constructed on contrapuntal lines, this movement shows many different characters: wild chromatic thirds, threatening bass quavers on the piano, glissando fifths on the cello and the climatic arm cluster on the piano. The last movement uses much of the material of the previous movements manipulated through imaginative processes of augmentation and repetition.

Prokofiev composed his Cello Sonata for Mstislav Rostropovich, who gave the first performance in 1950, with no less than Sviatoslav Richter at the piano. The pianist tells the story of performing the newly written work for two different judging panels, apparently for authorisation to perform it in public. Even though much of Prokofiev's music was banned because of accusations of formalism as defined by the Zhdanov Decree only a year before the cello sonata was written, there was relatively little official opposition to this sonata, as it is principally a lyrical work with little of the harmonic daring associated with the younger Prokofiev. The first movement is a fine example of Prokofiev's gift for melody, with an amusing passage where the two instruments imitate each other, and a poignant, chiming close. The wittily ironic second movement scherzo has an even more lyrical interlude and the energetic finale has an extremely dramatic finish all very much set in the key of C major, some might say as a form of mockery directed at the traditionalist government.

"The first disc of sonatas features the mighty Russian troika of Shostakovich, Schnittke and Prokofiev and how well Valencia and Austin ignite those very Slavic passions, never far below the surface in these works. With Shostakovich's 1934 Sonata, the pair extracts extraordinary colours from a compulsively dancing Allegro and, in a soul-searching Largo, find the stoic melancholy that the politically harassed composer portrayed so well. A gripping 1949 Sonata by Prokofiev, balancing acerbic wit with lyrical poignancy, reveals yet another composer doomed to play cat-and-mouse games with intransigent Soviet authorities. Schnittke could be more daring. Valencia teases us into his 1978 sonata with a long, beautifully sustained solo, caught to the last rustle of bow by the expert studio team of producer Wayne Laird and engineer Steve Garden." (William Dart, NZ Herald, April 2016.)

Source: highresaudio.com


Gateways – Qigang Chen (The Five Elements, & The Joy of Suffering), Fritz Kreisler (Tambourin chinois), and Sergei Rachmaninov (Symphonic Dances)

Maxim Vengerov, violin
Shanghai Symphony Orchestra
Conductor: Long Yu

Recorded September 2018 at Shanghai Symphony Hall
Released on June 28, 2019 by Deutsche Grammophon

The second Deutsche Grammophon release “"Gateways" by the newly signed Shanghai Symphony Orchestra and Long Yu features Chinese and Russian works. This is the first in a series of SSO albums featuring works by important Chinese composers. This 2019 release celebrates the orchestra's 140th anniversary – it is China's oldest orchestra. Star soloist Maxim Vengerov is the dedicatee and first performer of Qigang Chen's violin concerto "The Joy of Suffering". "Long Yu [is] a superpower of China's burgeoning music world" (Washington Post).

Source: europadisc.co.uk


The Shanghai Symphony Orchestra, founded in 1879, has a rich heritage, and here presents an East-meets-West program of great appeal. Qigang Chen left China in 1984 and moved to Paris, becoming Messiaen's last pupil. His musical language is ravishingly beautiful, atmospheric, and perfumed. The violin concerto "The Joy of Suffering", written as a competition piece, is gloriously brought to life by Maxim Vengerov. Like the orchestral Wu Xing, it manages to sound both French and Chinese. Rachmaninov's vibrant "Symphonic Dances" demonstrates what a superb ensemble this is and Long Yu directs with terrific authority. Kreisler's sparkling "Tambourin chinois" makes a cheeky encore.

Source: music.apple.com


Ludwig van Beethoven: Piano Trios, Vol. III – Trio in C minor Op.1 No.3, & Trio in E flat major Op.97 "Archduke"

Trio con Brio Copenhagen:
Soo-Jin Hong, violin
Soo-Kyung Hong, cello
Jens Elvekjaer, piano

Recorded January 7-10, 2019 at the DR Koncerthuset, Studio 2, Copenhagen
Released on June 21, 2019 by Orchid Classics

Beethoven's temperament was legendary. He often ended up quarrelling bitterly with his closest friends and with people who wished him well. Particularly the relation between Beethoven and Haydn would appear to have been especially complex. When Beethoven leaves his native city of Bonn in favour of Vienna in autumn 1792, his intention is to study under Haydn, who is now 60 and the most highly recognised composer of his age. But even though Haydn agreed to teach the young, talented Beethoven, the two never established a harmonious relationship. Beethoven was impatient and frustrated at having to spend time on elementary counterpoint assignments, and Haydn became irritated at Beethoven's obstinacy, referring to him as, among other things, "the great mogul".

One of their greatest musical disagreements would seem to have been about the Piano Trio in C minor, Op.1 No.3. According to Beethoven's later pupil Ferdinand Ries, Haydn did not think that it would be understood and received sufficiently positively by an audience. Throughout his life, Haydn had developed a sophisticated flair for composing original music which at the same time also satisfied the expectations of his musical employers. Beethoven, on the other hand, had revolutionary blood in his veins. Apart from his fractious temperament, he was an exponent of a new age, one in which personal liberty played an increasingly important role.

In the first two piano trios, with the binding designation opus 1, Beethoven had admittedly not only created a perfect springboard for excelling as a pianist but also kept within the norms that applied to Viennese salons. But in the third and last trio from the opus Beethoven shows his musical hand. Here for the first time we experience the germination of the radical Beethoven who is subsequently to change musical history. The darkly coloured main theme of the first movement, which is heard from the very beginning, smoulders with unreleased tension and is in C minor, which will later prove to be Beethoven's preferred key signature when he wants to express something stormy and heroic. This particularly applies to Symphony No.5 "Fate" and as an omen of this there is the fateful ta-ta-ta-taaaa knocking leitmotif in the form of a descending scale in the trio. At first, only softly in the piano after the pulse of the music has been suspended twice in a pause, and then loudly in the two strings.

Towards the end of the movement the fateful theme occurs once more. After Beethoven has thinned out the music to its softest nuances, he creates with an inserted Adagio a quiet moment of eternity which only dissolves when the piano comes in with the theme. This has the character of a life-giving impulse and leads on to a violent conclusion where the initial C minor, full of presentiment, now shows itself in its most unrelenting form. It is music that carries its head erect, blindly convinced of its own greatness.

In the following two movements, Beethoven leads the listener into milder zones. In Andante cantabile con variazioni the classical balance is regained. With delicate composition that offers plenty of scope for brilliance, the musical material is broken down into ever smaller constituents until an entrancingly beautiful minor variation causes the music to rise above time and place. Beethoven the man's dream of divine beauty can be glimpsed on the horizon. And even though the following Menuetto, with its ingenious play of rhythms, is beyond the regular pattern of the baroque, everything is done with elegance and humour.

This only serves to increase the effect of the final movement Finale, which is charged with volcanic force and where the music at no point calms down. One of Beethoven's artistic effects is the pause, which causes the intensity to increase, as the music subsequently changes track when the rocket-like thematics of the beginning are replaced by hectically repeated notes. Towards the conclusion the movement thins out, but the unrest continues, for although the music becomes softer, the feverish pulse remains intact until the very end. So that even after the last note, the musical fervour can still be sensed. The extent to which the music is over or not is something Beethoven leaves the individual listener to decide.

Beethoven's last Piano Trio in B flat major, Op.97 "The Archduke" marks Beethoven's farewell as a pianist. At the first performance in April 1814 in Vienna, where Beethoven sat at the piano, he played for the last time in public. His fellow composer Louis Spohr was present at the rehearsals for the concert: "As a result of his deafness, Beethoven had lost most of the virtuosity for which he had earlier been admired. In the forte passages the poor deaf man hammered away so the strings rattled, and in the piano he played so softly that whole clusters of notes were missing, so one lost the thread unless one was able to see the piano part at the same time. I was seized with great sorrow at such a tragic fate. Even if it is a great misfortune for anyone to become deaf, how can a musician bear this without falling into utter despair? Beethoven's almost constant melancholy was no longer a mystery to me".

But at the same time as Beethoven bids farewell as a performing musician, he opens the door to a different, greater world. In The Archduke Trio Beethoven's art – when it comes to chamber music – is at its zenith. The three instruments are treated more equally, since the cello plays a more prominent role and the violin is in a slightly lower register than formerly, which results in a specially warm and full-bodied sound. And with the opening singing theme, which develops with calmness and dignity in the piano, the opening movement, epic in length, is intoned. The struggle and eternal striving for change, which otherwise is a strong characteristic of Beethoven's music, is here laid aside. Instead, we meet a Beethoven who is capable of giving himself peace and simply being present in enjoying the moments of music.

Even in a long pizzicato section, where all three musicians must tiptoe through a distant harmonious twilight landscape, Beethoven underplays rather than the opposite. And the path out to a recalling of the golden harmonies of the opening passes through a no man's land closely ornamented by ghostlike trills in all three instruments. The effect is tremendous, despite the subdued style, and the feeling of being in the presence of a mature artist is striking.

In the following Scherzo we meet Beethoven's former musician-like ego. The theme that is flung out by the cello and wittily commented on by the violin is dancing and playful. But the form is complex, as in Beethoven's symphonic scherzos. The first part of the trio, which breaks with the light feel of the opening, is particularly striking. With a slowly advancing theme, first heard in the cello, we move into a devious musical landscape where we have lost our footing, both rhythmically and harmonically. The usual feeling of a musical centre of gravity has been suspended, and we are drawing near to an aesthetics developed by the composers of the Second Viennese School a century later.

The third movement is a hymn that points the way to a metaphysical world. This is partly due to the choice of the key of D major, which exists in a different sphere of the harmonic system than the main key of B flat major, and partly to the floating-free feel of the music. The tranquil triple time is reminiscent of the old stately court dance the Sarabande, which here assumes a solemn, ceremonial nature. Ably assisted by the mild major sounds, it is the love-filled humanist Beethoven who is speaking to us. After a total of four richly developed variations, we return to the opening theme, although this time in a more porous form, and after a few bars the music starts to dissolve. But out of the last dying notes Beethoven creates a musical transformation. The notes that have just perished are reborn in a murmuring, romantically coloured music that wells up before the movement comes to rest in pure harmony.

It turns out, nevertheless, to be an illusion, for with a slight shift of a few notes Beethoven punctures the elevated mood and we find ourselves once more in the more down-to-earth B flat major, where a primitive and boldly dancing theme reminds one of the street urchins Beethoven used to meet daily in the metropolis of Vienna. Now the finale is in full swing, and with a virtuoso movement that towards the end culminates in a Più presto – even faster – Beethoven the pianist sends us a final greeting, and allows a joie de vivre to triumph even so.

Source: orchidclassics.com


Erika Fox: Paths

Goldfield Ensemble:
Nicola Goldscheider, violin
Bridget Carey, viola
Sophie Harris, cello
Elena Hull, double bass
Hugh Webb, harp
Carla Rees, flutes
Anna Durance, oboe/cor anglais
George Barton, percussion
Kate Romano, clarinets
Ben Goldscheider, horn
Richard Uttley, piano

Conductor: Richard Baker 

Recorded November 24, 25 & 27, 2018 at Stapleford Granary, Cambridge, England
Released on June 28, 2019 by NMC Recordings

"It is incredibly rare to stumble across a virtually unknown or forgotten composer whose music genuinely excites and delivers, piece after piece. Erika Fox's language is bold, feisty, uncompromising and astonishingly fresh. A highly distinctive style has emerged from a childhood suffused with music of Eastern European origin. Hasidic music, liturgical chant embellished with heterophony mingle with modal ancient melodic lines reminiscent of Eastern European folk music. She is a composer who is constantly energised by sound and its inexhaustible possibilities." — Kate Romano (Artistic Director of Goldfield Ensemble)

In the 1970s, Erika was actively involved with the Fires of London, the Nash Ensemble, Dartington, and the Society for the Promotion of New Music (SPNM). Between 1974 and 1994 her works were regularly performed at London's South Bank Centre, at major festivals and were regularly broadcast in the UK and abroad, but then it all stopped...

We are delighted to bring her music to a new audience on this first commercial album and have selected six chamber pieces spanning a 25 year period (1980-2005). They represent the depth and scope of Fox's music and are a fine introduction to her extraordinary musical imagination. Erika says "I have always been interested in theatre and ritual, as a means of containing human drama within boundaries. Since my music owes almost nothing to Western musical tradition, and almost everything to my childhood memories of Jewish Liturgical chant and fragments of Hasidic melody, there is no harmonic development as such, rather single melodic lines, often in heterophony, held together by dint of varied repetition, and moulded, sometimes by use of percussion, to provide a ritualistic and perhaps theatrical whole".

"Refreshingly unusual... a ritual of untethered lines." (Sunday Times)

"Full of both kinds of extremes, emotionally and musically... the music sings of traditions old and new and is utterly Erika Fox's own." (BBC Radio 3)

"Fox's music is really fascinating and different... this album is a gem." (Art Music Lounge)

"Distinctive, uncompromising, theatrical... the performances are exemplary, bringing vivid colour and vibrancy to Erika Fox's striking aural world." (Planet Hugill)

Source: nmcrec.co.uk


Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart: Piano Sonatas, Vol. II – Sonatas No.7 (K.309), No.9 (K.311), No.8 (K.310), & Rondo in A minor (K.511)

Peter Donohoe, piano

Recorded March 3-4, 2019 at Royal Birmingham Conservatoire
Released on June 21, 2019 by SOMM Recordings

The much anticipated second volume of Peter Donohoe's complete survey of Mozart's Piano Sonatas for SOMM Recordings focuses on three sonatas produced during the composer's ill-fated journey to Paris in 1777.

This new release follows remarkable critical acclaim for Volume 1 including the accolade of BBC Music Magazine's Recording of the Month which declared: "It was high time someone blew the cobwebs off this still under-appreciated repertoire, and Donohoe is clearly the person to do it".

Volume 2 promises more revealing performances from Donohoe, applauded in Gramophone's review of Volume 1 for demonstrating "a personal involvement that is as touching as it is fascinating and finely considered".

As if anticipating the mighty Jupiter Symphony, with uncharacteristically detailed tempo indications and an improvisatory quality in places, the Piano Sonata in C major (No.7, K.309) may have been composed with Rosa Cannabich in mind, Mozart's 15-year-old student giving its first performance in late 1777.

In a relatively rare key signature for Mozart, the A minor Piano Sonata (No.8, K.310) was composed in 1778 immediately after the death of the composer's mother. Intense and expressive, it shows, Christopher Morley succinctly suggests in his informative notes, "Mozart at his most grim". Spacious, full of grand gestures and animated display, the Piano Sonata in D major (No.9, K.311) is "a big, spectacular Sonata, full of effect and colour" that explores the full range of the keyboard with winning exuberance.

The A minor Rondo (K.511) was composed in March 1787 and, notes Christopher Morley, "unfettered by the obligations of orchestral constraints, [it] builds in chromatic intensity and melodic urgency to emerge as one of the most profound movements ever penned by the composer".

Volume 2 of Peter Donohoe's Mozart Piano Sonatas delivers on the hope expressed by The Classical Review of its predecessor to "surely make listeners eager to hear the next volumes".

Source: somm-recordings.com


Johannes Brahms: Cello Sonatas

Asier Polo, cello
Eldar Nebolsin, piano

Recorded July 2-4, 2018 at Auditorio Manuel De Falla, Granada, Spain
Released on July 5, 2019 by IBS Classical

 The music of Brahms, regardless of tastes, trends or aesthetic currents, is already part of the whisper of history. It does not need defenders, it does not concern detractors. It just stays. This recording that is presented here breathes nobility. Nobility in the message of Brahms's work and nobility in an interpretation that also starts from an absolute devotion to the music of two performers in a moment of full artistic maturity. There are no hesitations here either, the ideas are clearly and emphatically exposed, everything emerges and develops as if there were no other possibility of interpretation. Pure music that demands a total surrender and that parts from the deep knowledge of the Brahmsian language that the interpreters display at all times.

Source: ibsclassical.es


Cello Solo Journey – Paul Tortelier, Sergei Prokofiev, Mstislav Rostropovich, Alexander Nikolayevich Tcherepnin, Miklós Rózsa, Giovanni Sollima, Isaac Albéniz, Astor Piazzolla, Rogerio y Taguell, Carter Brey, Ilse de Ziah, Sebastien Diezig

Luciano Tarantino, cello

Recorded March 2-4, 2018 at Music Suite, Comune di Sammichele di Bari, Italy
Released on July 26, 2019 by Brilliant Classics

A voyage across a century of solo cello repertoire from Europe and America.

When the Catalan cellist Pablo Casals revived the solo suites of Bach in the first decades of the last century, he reminded both audiences and composers of the huge potential of his instrument to hold the stage in its own right, no less than a violin or a piano. Inspired by his charisma, and that of his successors such as Tortelier and Rostropovich, many modern composers have followed Bach’s example. The Italian cellist presents music by ten of them on this exciting debut album for Brilliant Classics.

Tortelier and Rostropovich are represented by their own, little-known but highly imaginative works – a Circus Suite and an innocently titled but fearsomely challenging study respectively. Carter Brey, the principal cellist of the New York Philharmonic, has also written for the instrument with inside knowledge, in a tango of big, seductive gestures preceded on Tarantino's album by Latin-themed showpieces from Albéniz, Piazzolla and Rogerio y Taguell.

Each half of the album is brought to a reflective close with a soliloquy by the modern Italian composer Giovanni Sollima. The cello's melancholy moods are further explored by Ilse de Ziah and Sebastian Diezig, but Tarantino has chosen and ordered his repertoire to display the cello's expressive range to its fullest. Mixing familiar and little-known composers, it's a perfect introduction to the ever-expanding universe of solo cello music beyond Bach.

Born in 1977, Luciano Tarantino is a performer and teacher with his origins in Puglia, in the far south of Italy. He has played with many of today's greatest conductors and founded a music festival in the region of his birth. On this recording he plays a fine 1736 cello by Antonio Testore.

This stimulating program takes the listener on a journey of discovery, a musical universe captured in 20th century original music for cello solo, by such diverse composers as Sergei Prokofiev, Mstslav Rostropovich, Paul Tortelier, Giovanni Sollima, Astor Piazzolla, Alexander Tcherepnin, Isaac Albéniz and others. The music exploits the instrumental and musical possibilities of the cello to the utmost, and sometimes even beyond.

Italian cellist Luciano Tarantino is an enterprising and versatile musician, active as orchestral player, chamber music player and soloist. With the present program he embarked on an extensive international tour.

Source: brilliantclassics.com


Reissue / archive

Ginette Neveu: The Complete Recordings

Ginette Neveu, violin
Jean Neveu, piano
Bruno Seidler-Winkler, piano

Philharmonia Orchestra
Conductors: Walter Susskind, Issay Dobrowen

Jean Sibelius: Violin Concerto in D minor, Op.47
Johannes Brahms: Violin Concerto in D major, Op.77
Ernest Chausson: Poème for Violin & Orchestra, Op.25
Maurice Ravel: Tzigane
Maurice Ravel: Vocalise-étude en forme de habanera
Ion Scărlătescu: Bagatelle
Manuel de Falla: Danza Española No.1
Frédéric Chopin: Nocturne No.20 in C sharp minor, B.49 (piano: Jean Neveu)
Grigoraș Dinicu: Hora Staccato
Josef Suk: Four Pieces for Violin and Piano, Op.17
Claude Debussy: Violin Sonata in G minor
Fritz Kreisler: Grave in C minor in the Style of W.F. Bach
Fritz Kreisler: Four Pieces for Violin and Piano, Op.17 (excerpt)
Frédéric Chopin: Nocturne No.20 in C sharp minor, B.49 (piano: Bruno Seidler-Winkler)
Christoph Willibald Gluck: Orfeo ed Euridice, Wq.30, Act II: Melody (Dance of the Blessed Spirits)
Maria Theresia von Paradis: Sicilienne in E flat major
Fritz Kreisler: Variations on a Theme of Corelli
Richard Strauss: Violin Sonata in E flat major, Op.18

Released on June 21, 2019 by Warner Classics

The French violinist Ginette Neveu was just 30 when her plane crashed in the Azores in October 1949. She had studied with George Enescu and Carl Flesch, and as The Observer wrote in 1945, "Her playing was superbly vigorous and passionate, and made the impression that its great qualities, such as eloquent phrasing and an apparently limitless range and variety of tone, came from the only true source – an identity with the music and with her instrument". Her complete recordings, specially remastered from the best sources available, are gathered on these four CDs, with her incandescent Sibelius Concerto taking pride of place.

— 2019 marks the centenary of Ginette Neveu's birth.
— Newly remastered in 96kHz/24bit from the best sources available by Studio Art & Son, Annecy.
— All recording details are presented in the booklet in a table with date, matrix number, take number (where known), original catalogue number, date, venue and source used for the present box.
— French violinist Ginette Neveu studied with George Enescu and Carl Flesch and rapidly built an international carrier and reputation. She died aged just 30 with her brother Jean Neveu in a plane which tragically crashed in the Azores in October 1949.
— "Her playing was superbly vigorous and passionate, and made the impression that its great qualities, such as eloquent phrasing and an apparently limitless range and variety of tone, came from the only true source – an identity with the music and with her instrument." (The Observer, 1945)
— The present box gathers the complete studio recordings done by Ginette Neveu and contains the first CD reissue in the West of Ion Scărlătescu's Bagatelle.

Source: prestomusic.com


Ginette Neveu (August 11, 1919 – October 27, 1949) was a French violinist.

Born in Paris into a very musical family, Ginette Neveu became a violinist and her brother Jean-Paul Neveu a classical pianist. She was also the grandniece of composer Charles-Marie Widor (1844-1937). A child prodigy, Ginette Neveu took lessons from her mother and made her solo debut at the age of seven with the Colonne Orchestra in Paris. Her parents then decided to send her to study under Line Talluel, and after further studies with Jules Boucherit at the Paris Conservatory, she completed her training with instruction from George Enescu, Nadia Boulanger, and Carl Flesch.

At age 15, Ginette Neveu achieved worldwide celebrity status when she won the Henryk Wieniawski Violin Competition over 180 contestants, including the future virtuoso David Oistrakh, who finished second. Neveu was immediately signed to an extensive touring contract that, over the next two years, saw her give solo performances at the leading concert halls of Germany, Poland, the Soviet Union, the United States, and Canada.

Neveu's international career was interrupted by World War II, but she finally was able to make her London debut in 1945. Her brother Jean-Paul accompanied her on piano, and the two toured post-war Europe extensively (appearing at the Prague Spring International Music Festival), as well as visiting Australia and South America. They also made return engagements at major venues in the United States. Noted for her intensity, power, and impeccable sonority, Ginette Neveu is recognized as one of the world's great violinists, despite a career that ended at a very young age.

Ginette Neveu gave her last concert on October 20, 1949. A week later, on October 27, she and her brother boarded an Air France flight en route to another series of concert engagements. All 48 passengers on board the flight, including the famous French boxing champion Marcel Cerdan, died when the plane flew into a mountain after two failed attempts to make a landing at the São Miguel Island airport in the Azores.

It is said that Ginette Neveu's body was found still clutching her Stradivarius in her arms.

Source: last.fm/music


The albums were chosen by the owner and blog editor of "Faces of Classical Music", Alexandros Arvanitakis.